Apparently Nick's theory based on the expert that he cited by name, our French guy. Apparently Nick's theory is that the bullet didn't even hit the spine on the way in. It entered Charlie's neck here, passed beyond his spine into the back, and bounced off of his skin, and then did a 180 degree turn, a 306 bullet, and was trampolined with so much speed back into Charlie's spine that it, I guess, according to the official narrative that Nick is paring, then shattered his C2 all the way down to his C7, just obliterated his spine, and then [snorts] just lodged right beneath the skin down by T1. Nick is being forced to
0:48continually respond to this over and over and over and just like make more and more mistakes because his own fans are sending him super chats being like, "Nick, this is not a good look, bro.
0:56Nick, you should not don't keep doing this. Nick, you're [ __ ] you're [ __ ] it up, Nick."
1:00>> Conspiracy theories [music] are entering a danger.
1:03>> Information is the oxygen of the >> There's so much evidence [music] out there that even if less than 1% is true, That be enough to collapse the current paradigm and change the whole planet.
1:23Well, Nick Fuentes just can't help himself. He keeps on digging his hole deeper and deeper and deeper and getting more emotional in his responses, more ad hominemum in his attacks. and he started to venture into discussing the evidence in Charlie Kirk a little bit and discussing the ballistics and the skin and all sorts of other amazing topics.
1:44And I just can't help but make a video response because Nick is just perfectly teeing up um a good discussion about what's really going on out here and who's really got information and who's got a whole bunch of logical fallacy ad homonym and generally emotional uh like I I I hesitate to use the word crashing out but it kind of feels like an animal backed into a corner right now. He feels like a man that's got something to lose that is out on a limb on the wrong side of the argument.
2:20And it's very public and we can all watch and we're about to. And Nick, you don't have to keep doing this. You don't have to keep on just handing out gifts.
2:30You don't have to keep on serving it up on a silver platter.
2:34But if you want to keep attacking me and calling me names and stuff, I can't help but respond to the large substance of your answers, the substance of your argument. And don't worry, this one's not going to have to be two hours long because we already did that. We already beat that horse to death. And because Nick's uh points are getting more and more hollow and more and more easily debunked, but they do give us space for a very interesting conversation. And they give a space to address some of the experts that have conveniently flooded the zone right after I brought up a whole bunch of noise about how we
3:11literally the first piece of evidence, the bullet, the gunshot does not work.
3:15The gun that they say was used. The gun that links Tyler Robinson to the scene.
3:20The gun that Tyler Robinson's dad did not see a photo of when he said that that was why he knew it was his son that did the murder. That gun is not the gun.
3:29The the bullet doesn't match, even though they've not shown it to us.
3:32They've not shown us the autopsy, but they've leaked enough and they've confirmed enough of their official narrative that we very well know that this is not possible.
3:44So, we're going to use this opportunity to kind [clears throat] of laugh at Nick Fuentes' whatever you want to call it and also address some of the other experts that have been coming out to call me names online and kind of exposing the game while they're at it. So, let's not waste any time. Let's get right into it.
4:03>> Evidence. Why not respond to it? You ask for evidence and now say you're not keeping an open mind. A lot of your fans are banned and muted in chat for disagreeing about Charlie. Not a good look. If you believe in x up to 3206 then content with the arguments has open to do a live stream.
4:14>> You're an idiot. He's an idiot and he's a small fry compared to me. I'll debate Candace Owens about it. I'm not debating him. He's an ankle biter.
4:24[snorts] Nick's scared. And it's hard to bite your ankles when I'm more than a foot taller than you, Nick. But I'll try not to be too mean here.
4:35>> The only reason he did a video about me, it's so typical. I did a one minute clip responding.
4:42>> Nick did a one minute clip responding.
4:44Yeah, the clip I was responding to is 8 minutes, Nick. So, I don't I don't know what clip you're referring to, but [clears throat] these are the types of um small not super important inconsistencies and just little lies that are adding up on Nick's side.
4:58Little little um shall we say displays of the insecurity of his position where he has to kind of fudge everything to make it seem like there's no argument for him to argue against. to make it seem like we have no position over here, like all the conspiracy theorists are crazy. Yeah, there's a lot of those going on.
5:15>> He said, "Oh, boy." And then he did a twohour video clip farming me.
5:20>> Actually, Nick, clip farming is where I go back through your past and grab a whole bunch of clips of you saying things in other context, out of context, like the hilarious GTA clip that I defended you on cuz I thought that [ __ ] was funny as hell. Um, [snorts] that's clip farming. This was just me making a direct response to you asking for evidence because you don't seem to know about it. So, I gave you two hours of evidence, but trust me, there's way more than two hours. That's why there's so much content about this is because there's so much depth to how much this doesn't make sense. We could go on for
5:51hours and hours more, but I thought two was enough to thoroughly [ __ ] on your parade.
5:57>> [ __ ] you. [ __ ] him. [laughter] There is no ev What's the evidence?
6:02>> There is no evidence. Wait, what's the evidence?
6:04>> Well, the bullet could never do that.
6:08>> See, here we're going to get into the part where he tries to make the argument sound [ __ ] but he's just exposing his own lack of an argument. You can go watch my two-hour video. You can compare it to his representation of it.
6:24It's very transparent. We have the internet, Nick. We can all watch things.
6:27>> That's not evidence. One. Two, there are many ballistics experts that disagree.
6:34JF Gripy did a one-hour video about it.
6:38>> I'm This part's going to be great, too.
6:39We're going to respond to JF Griie a little bit and to Phoenix Ammunition and to all the other experts that have just popped up conveniently to um you know, shovel the Fed slop conveniently all of a sudden, right?
6:53when there's a new resurgence of conversation about how this doesn't work.
7:00>> There's a number of other ammunition sellers and other ballistics experts that >> ammunition sellers. Yeah, we know who you're talking about, Nick. It's cool.
7:06We got this. We'll take it from here. Um JF Gripy is this French guy. It's got to be French. He's a [snorts] neurosurgeon, a brain surgeon apparently. Um >> All right. So, we are now entering the main portion of the show where >> We are now entering the main portion of the show.
7:23Um, and he replays a bunch of my video.
7:25He makes a bunch of points. Um, this part right here, um, I think is relevant and interesting.
7:32Very interesting. And the number of big accounts that have come out and reposted this video saying, "This is the best argument I've seen."
7:39Yeah.
7:40>> About a 10 degree angle.
7:41>> That's the only way you could ever possibly imagine that there was no exit wound. And >> no, my theory is that the skin played the role here. And I will prove that to you tonight >> because all the Te USA leakers have told us that the autopsy says that it hit.
7:52>> He's not kidding. His theory is that the skin stopped the bullet, the vertebrae, and then traveled down his spine and obliterated him. [snorts] >> Muscle structure that you would find in a human neck. This is where the bullet would have gone.
8:03>> Sineas says, "I don't know what I'm talking about. Wait for the rest of my argument, sir. And if you're not convinced at the end of this show that it could have happened, uh, I don't know. I I will I will say sorry.
8:14>> For it to go into the body, we have to believe it would have done two things.
8:17It would have had to take a hard turn in towards the center of the body and then been impressed by or stopped by these bones here enough to get >> no it was stopped by the skin and bounced toward the bones. Now as it was bounced by the skin through back through the elasticity of the skin then it didn't have its kinetic energy anymore in full because the skin absorbs a lot of kinetic energy. It rolls back just a little bit and that just a little bit was enough to just push back the bullet to go along the spine but not too deep.
8:41down into the [laughter] >> bro [snorts] thinks that the skin is a trampoline.
8:50This surgeon thinks that the skin is a trampoline that's going to bounce back the bullet from the back of Charlie's neck with enough force to then travel back through muscle tissue, hit the bone vertebrae, shatter them, travel, then do a right-hand turn, travel down the bone vertebrae, shatter them, shatter them, shatter them all the way down to T1.
9:12That's a very powerful trampoline, Mr.
9:15Jean Francois, you're a surgeon.
9:21A, you think that a bullet can come in from the front and then hit the skin at the back with so much force that it can do all that, but somehow the skin is going to make it do a 90 degree, sorry, a 180 degree turn.
9:39I'm sorry, that is not what bullets do. Like, you really can't make this up.
9:47I thought we were going to have like I I didn't even watch this video when it first came out because I was like, I kind of see what's going on here.
9:53[snorts] And now that I'm actually watching it, it's like, holy [ __ ] guys.
9:56This is really the best you can do.
10:01Bullet refraction is when a bullet comes into a substance like like a body or like water and and it often will refract a little bit and change its direction over over time and over distance.
10:13But go watch the bullet ballistics experts. They have broken down exactly how bullet refraction works.
10:18>> Refracts straight down into the T1. Uh yeah, that's not what a 306 round is going to do if it hits a human neck bird. We know it's going to blow right through. But even if there was some weird refraction, bullets aren't going to refract almost 90 degrees. We've talked about that. And then keep their actual velocity to be able to do that much damage. Not really a thing. again.
10:39So with just basic middle school math, we >> of where the shot would have hit the neck. I think that this is roughly accurate in terms of the entry. Now, here's my claim. The skin here, given that the bullet was tumbling, the bullet was unable to pierce the skin. And I will show you this through video. I swear to you, by the end of this show tonight, I will show you the skin of Charlie Kirk creating a V-shaped reaction to the bullet. Okay? This is absolutely new. I'm the first to claim this. I've seen it on a single frame of the video. I'm telling you, the bullet tumbled, bumped in the back of Charlie
11:10Kirk's neck in the on the skin, not on the vertebrae. It bumped exactly right here. So, this guy is correct with his line. But what these guys have to understand, Yan, Carol included, is that the skin then pushed the bullet back into Charlie Kirk. And you'll see it on video. I'm guaranteeing you tonight.
11:26That is his claim.
11:29[laughter] That is legitimately his claim.
11:33We have been told by TPUSA that Charlie Kirk's spine was exploded from the C2 all the way down to C7 and that the bullet was found down by T1.
11:47And so by Nick's cited expert, Jean Francois Gar and I'm not trying to make fun of his name. I just love making fun of the French language in general. It's a fun language to speak.
12:01Um, but Jean Francois, the neurosurgeon, is agreeing with Chris Martinsson here that the path of the bullet didn't even hit the spine until after it bounced off the back skin of Charlie's neck and did a 180 degree turn and then rebounded with so much force from that skin that it exploded his spine. from C2 down to C7 apparently.
12:36Well, Nick, that is quite the expert to site. That is quite the theory to hoist up as though you know what the [ __ ] you're talking about. It's just basic Newtonian physics. You don't even need to be a ballistics expert to understand this.
12:51I actually thought that this video would be like complex. I thought it would challenge my thinking. I was not expecting this at all when I turned this on this morning.
13:02Now, let's talk about Phoenix Ammunition, [laughter] our favorite ammunition expert.
13:08Phoenix Ammunition has been tweeting like it's his full-time job. Ever since he joined the Frey the other day, very convenient timing. Where you at, Phoenix? So, Phoenix Ammunition joined the Frey a number of days ago, a couple days ago, calling Candace a dumbass, calling me a dumbass, calling Valhalla VFT a dumbass, calling everyone a dumbass because he's an expert because he makes bullets. Lots of bullets. And he was working on a chalkboard talk as we speak to discuss the myriad of variables involved. Yeah, we know there's lots of variables involved. Yes, ballistics is very complicated. I responded, "You saw where Green Beret
13:43Valhalla VFT shot clean through 38 inch steel, shot through cow femurss wrapped thickly in meat, or where Dr. Chris Martinson did 38 tests on pork shoulders, all 38 exited. They even went through the pork shoulder, the bone, a particle board, and then one wall of a cinder block, which I showed in my last video about this." So, I hope you've got some really fancy numbers on your blackboard to explain how Charlie's neck contained multiple thousand footpounds of force. Let's find his blackboard talk. His blackboard talk was a 40minute video of his notebook pa p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p
14:12p p p p p p p p p p p pages just with math, math, math, math, math, math, math. Yeah. Yeah, math is important.
14:19Math is complicated. Bullets are complicated. Yeah, that's cool. That's cool. So, it shouldn't be a problem since it's so possible and so likely for bullets to be stopped by human necks, literally one of the largest rounds that you make, I I assume, um, to be stopped by human necks, that you could very easily go out and shoot some tests and within maybe 20 rounds, you would get at least one that was stopped by something comparable at all to a human neck. cuz so far we've had experts testing 306 rounds on all sorts of [ __ ] way stronger than human necks and it's blown through all of them. So he quote tweeted me in other words they
14:57replicated exactly none of what happened that day which was the entire premise of my presentation. Thank you for proving my point. Thanks buddy. We got this from here. You can go back to driving taxis again because they always got to throw out homonym as though they have just discredited the factual arguments but you know have fun with it. The whole point of the tests is that no one's going to shoot another human in the living neck. Duh, dude. So, we obviously can't run the test, which is obviously a part of the reason why you all are running this propaganda piece. And I'm not saying you're being paid to do it.
15:31I'm saying that it's propaganda one way or the other.
15:35And so what all of these experts have fallen back on in lie of shooting a human in the neck is shooting at things way stronger than a human neck. Shooting at giant pork roasts that have way more dens, way more muscle, way more bone, way stronger bone. Shooting at literal steel. Shooting at cow femurss.
15:59Shooting at just about everything.
16:01Because obviously if you think it through, if the bullet just keeps on going through things that are stronger than Charlie's neck, then shooting at something weaker probably going to yield some similar results, maybe even worse, right? And the best you could possibly do short of shooting a living human on camera is shooting a ballistic dummy.
16:21And we've got that, too.
16:24So, Mr. Phoenix ammunition man, we're all waiting for you to take some of your highly esteemed ammunition out to the range and film some tests for us. Make some video evidence of just how likely it is. Maybe take a 100 rounds of 300 6, 100 pork roast, 100 whatever you want.
16:41You could get a whole leg of cow. You could put a whole moose carcass out there. Take a 100 shots at it. Film it all. Put it online. Tell us how many of those hundred shots go through and through whatever carcass you choose to shoot at. Hell, take steel plate. Just take a giant 38 inch steel plate out there and see how many times your esteemed 30 six rounds penetrate the steel plate.
17:02That'll be some information. It won't be a living human neck, obviously. But no one's going to do that. Duh. So, I clarified for Mr. Ammunition Man that this is called journalism, where we investigate claims, we look for sources, we, you know, display the facts, we kind of tease them out, we look for more facts, we try to debunk them. Anyone can do it. Even a literal taxi driver can do it. Even an ammunition seller can do it.
17:30Anyone can do it. They just might not be very good at it. You can be the judge of that. And I offered that maybe he should do some tests like all these other experts have been doing, like Dr. Chris Martinson did, because I don't see any tests. I just see a lot of a lot of talking. Just a lot of talking. a lot of obfuscation behind complexity and math.
17:55If your math was so great, you'd think one of these bullets would have stopped in one of these extremely strong bones, pieces of meat, steel plates, etc.
18:04But that's not what's happening.
18:07You might realize, Nick, and everyone citing Phoenix ammunition, that Phoenix Ammunition is Justin Nazerof, and he's appeared on the Tim Pool podcast a couple of times. You [snorts] can watch clips of him. He posted a video recently. All I'm going to say about Justin Nazerof is that he claimed he confirmed that this is his LinkedIn page, which obviously it is. He's the general manager. He's also the founder, as far as I can tell, of Phoenix Ammunition [clears throat] back in 2016.
18:35So, he's been making bullets since 2016.
18:38Good on you, bro. [snorts] And before that, he was an account manager at Sentry Insurance. He was an insurance guy. Um, he was an engineer recruiter at the Bartk Group. He was a search consultant at Nationwide Executive Search. And he was a technical recruiter at Reliance One, Inc.
18:58And he went to college. He's got a college degree. So, yeah.
19:05Sorry, Phoenix, but I'm going to go with the literal green beret that served multiple tours of duty that is extremely experienced in combat medicine. I'm going to go with people like Zeb Boyin, who's a literal ballistics expert, because right now, Justin, it looks like you're shilling a narrative.
19:26It looks like you're very sure of your narrative, and it's a little weird.
19:32But let's be fair, for what it's worth, when you go to Phoenix Ammunition's Twitter profile and you scroll back through his page and his mentions of places like Israel and all that, he's been very apparently America first. He's been very critical of Israel. He's been very critical of corrupt governments as far as I can see. He's he's got a pretty solid Twitter profile before this outrage. Um, I didn't do a super extensive dig, but Phoenix Ammunition is not overtly on X in Israel show, so don't come don't come after him for that.
20:04>> [snorts] >> um makes it a little weird how why he's so certain that he needs to debunk this narrative now, right?
20:15Specifically now when this all flares back up. But hey, if you want to buy your ammo from him, you buy your ammo from him. Um, maybe if he's too [ __ ] to take his rounds out to the range and film some tests and post them on the internet, maybe someone else could buy some 306 rounds from our boy Justin and uh, take them out on the range and see if those bullets penetrate stuff.
20:43See if they can get stopped by anything comparable to a human neck. So, Nick, great experts, A+. Yes. Apparently Nick's theory based on the expert that he cited by name, our French guy.
20:58Apparently Nick's theory is that the bullet didn't even hit the spine on the way in. It entered Charlie's neck here, passed beyond his spine into the back, and bounced off of his skin, and then did a 180 degree turn, a 306 bullet, and was trampolined with so much speed back into Charlie's spine that it, I guess, according to the official narrative that Nick is paring, then shattered his C2 all the way down to his C7. just obliterated his spine and then just lodged right beneath the skin down by T1. It's possible that Nick doesn't think all of that. It's possible that our French gentleman doesn't think
21:44that the spine was shattered at all.
21:47It's possible because I didn't even care to go all the way to his end of his video honestly once I heard that he thought the skin was a [ __ ] trampoline that could stop a bullet.
21:55[clears throat] Um, and yeah, we know we know about yaw. We know that bullets can tumble. We know all of that.
22:03If this is the if this is what you want to go with, you just keep on going, bro.
22:08Christmas is coming early. I suppose.
22:11Um, but we are being told by people directly affiliated with TPUSA, multiple that the autopsy shows that the spine is eviscerated from C2, which is behind your [ __ ] face.
22:28Bullet incoming from the front. C2 is behind your [ __ ] face.
22:34So maybe the Frenchman's on to something. Maybe that's how it hit the C2 is it bounced off the back of his neck and then went upwards to the C2 and then went straight downwards down his spine and just Yeah. This is the illustrious Nick Fuentes, folks. The the illustrious Nickuentes. Sorry, I'm sorry. I'm getting into attacking him back. It's [snorts] just low hanging fruit. We'll try not to pick it.
23:04>> They've said the same thing.
23:07Okay. [snorts] And Ian Carol's not a ballistics expert.
23:11He goes on and says, "Well, some hunter shot a thing from 100 feet away."
23:15>> I'm not a ballistics expert. Um, but again with the No, no, no, Nick. Actually, I'm citing a whole bunch of combat veterans, ex special forces, some hunters, some people that run ballistics expertise channels specifically. Um, a wide variety of folks, basically everyone except for this swarm of shills that are now coming out. Way. So, that's not evidence.
23:42>> Yes, it is.
23:45Look it up. Type it into your dictionary, Nick. Come on. You're smart.
23:48You speak English. The problem is you don't understand formal logic. You don't understand this part is gold rationality.
23:59Let's learn about formal logic and rationality. Formal logic is a system of reasoning that evaluates arguments based on their structure focused on the validity of the logical form rather than the content of the premises. A formal fallacy occurs when there is a flaw in the logical structure of a deductive argument, rendering invalid, even if the premises are true.
24:20You mean sort of like when you use a straw man argument, Nick? A logical fallacy where someone misrepresents an opponent's position by distorting, exaggerating, or oversimplifying it to make it easier to attack.
24:31Kind of like that.
24:36Oh, for you, this kind of vague insinuation, I feel like something's off here. You you read >> Yeah. You mean misrepresenting your opponent's argument to make it seem oversimplified or just not even representing it at all?
24:52>> Yeah.
24:53Formal logic, Nick.
24:55>> Register that as evidence. That's not evidence.
24:58>> Yeah. Whatever you just said was not evidence.
25:02That was you doing some weird [ __ ] >> Oh, okay. A big bullet didn't do a thing. No. Okay. and you register.
25:13>> Yeah. Actually, physics is evidence.
25:16Ballistics is evidence.
25:20You ever watched a murder trial, Nick?
25:23Like, for example, the JFK assassination, which I think we're probably going to talk about here in a second.
25:28>> That like that's an argument. That's not an argument. You need a postulate. You need a hypothesis. You need a theory, a conjecture. You have none of that.
25:38You seem to misunderstand what's going on here, Nick.
25:43Unlike all of you, we are not saying that we know what happened. We're trying to investigate what happened. You are saying that you do know what happened.
25:53You are the one with the theory. Your theory is the official theory, the fed slop narrative. Tyler Robinson took the shot, one shot with his grandappy's 306 rifle at about 140 yards from the roof of the Losi center and it struck Charlie Kirk in the neck and killed him by going into his neck. I you the the theory may differ here, but the autopsy apparently says that it hit his spine at C2 way up here and then deflected at a near 90° angle and traveled down his spine exploding all these vertebrae down to C7 and then it lodged somewhere around T1.
26:36That is the theory. You guys are the ones with the theory. We are saying your [ __ ] theory doesn't make sense.
26:45We don't need a theory because we're journalists and we're trying to investigate what happened. And some people are coming up with theories.
26:53I investigate many. Personally, I don't hold any of them. I don't think I know what happened, but I know you're full of [ __ ] And I know that this is just like waking up on Christmas morning. So, please do not stop. Please make this bigger video that you said you would make. Just tearing it all up, just eviscerating this clown Uber Eatats driver, Ian Carol.
27:20>> You You're not even an expert in the subject. You have no expertise. There is no forensic evidence.
27:26>> There is no forensic evidence.
27:30You mean like the video of it happening?
27:36You mean like all the other videos from the scene? And there's way more than that, I would presume, behind the closed doors of the investigation, of the FBI investigation, which I'm sure is totally above board. I'm sure it's all good at the FBI. Jeffrey Epstein totally killed himself, never trafficked anyone to anyone.
27:57Next thing you know, that'll be what Nick is talking about.
28:01>> You have this the first of all, you're completely ignorant. Sorry, that was a logical fallacy. I I just jumped jumped the fence to the next argument over >> person and then it's just this vague, oh, okay. Yeah, I guess a giant bullet didn't leave an exit wound.
28:18>> Yeah, you can go and watch my video for yourself and see if that's the substance of my argument and that's how I presented it.
28:26What you don't understand is that bullets do >> see here's where he starts to parrot Jean Franuis's talking points.
28:36This part's great. Nick >> when a bullet enters skin starts talking about skin which is like the key word that French homie keeps on saying it's just this is all that's been downloaded into Nick's little brain and now he's just where did bullet enter? Sorry, I'm not going to make fun of I'm not going to do it.
28:56>> It can change the trajectory of a bullet. It can alter its velocity.
29:00>> Yeah, when a bullet enters a substance, it can change its trajectory and velocity. Usually, a very small amount, it will deflect off course and travel over time in a different direction.
29:11Bullets don't bounce off skin and go the opposite direction and retain their velocity. Bro, that's not how it happens. Skin can't hold 2,000 foot-pounds of force.
29:25even if the bullet is tumbling.
29:29And I mean maybe like there's a slight chance, a miraculous chance.
29:36But I would point out that the official narrative that you're paring is that it was a miracle. Is that there's almost no possible way that a bullet would do this. And so it's just a miracle that the bullet was stopped by his neck. The surgeon himself apparently said that.
29:51>> TB USA said that. Oh yeah. Here you go.
29:53Fox News today. Man of steel. Charlie Kirk's body stopped a bullet that would typically just go through everything.
30:00And it was an absolute miracle nobody else was killed. His surgeon told Turning Point USA. And another one.
30:05Surgeon says Charlie Kirk's neck stopped Bullet from killing anyone else. He's like the man of steel.
30:11Okay, we're guys, we're going to talk uh everything in this. We're going to talk ballistics. We're going to talk anatomy.
30:16We're going to talk physics. Uh and just we're going to look at the actual post Turning Point put out here in a second.
30:22I I'm blown away by how stupid this is.
30:24The man of steel. It's a miracle. We're going with That's the explanation. Now, the official story now is claiming this is a miracle.
30:33There we go. To add to the FBI's story, it's a miracle. And Charlie Kirk was the man of steel. I am I'm so blown away that this is where where we're at with this.
30:42I can't I can't imagine any of you watching this are going, "Yep, sounds good." If you if you're calling people like me a conspiracy theorist right now for looking at this story and looking at posts like that and going that's total [ __ ] guys I'm sorry but this is from top to bottom start to finish this entire thing has been pathetic from the FBI.
31:06>> I just want to point out on the wall Nate's metals hanging up in case you didn't notice.
31:13Yeah, >> it can change direction because skin is very elastic.
31:20>> And you're not a physicist and neither am I. And you're not a [laughter] ballistics.
31:24>> Did you watch Nick's brain quickly go, oh, maybe you shouldn't get into this line of thinking. Maybe you shouldn't do this part. This is not going to go well.
31:33And he's like, I you're not an expert and I'm not an expert, so why are we even talking about this >> expert? And neither am I. So for a complete amateur to go and say big bullet didn't do this. Okay, that's not journalists report on things that they're not experts at all the time and they go to experts and they ask questions and they cite those sources and they present them to you.
31:59But I it's easy for me to forget, Nick, that you're also not a journalist.
32:03You're a political commentator with some really interesting political aspirations, it would seem. Um, so to expect you to be doing journalism or to understand journalism maybe is a bridge too far.
32:18>> Proof of anything. And by the way, what would that even be proof of?
32:25>> You don't have any evidence. And then and there is no evidence and your evidence sucks. And by the way, even if there was evidence, what would that even be proof of?
32:36Just let's let's clear this up, Nick, in case it was too complicated. [snorts] If the rifle that they say was used, the rifle that links Tyler Robinson to the scene, if the bullets that that rifle fires could not possibly have made, or let's be really precise, could almost never in a million years. The smallest, tiniest, tiniest, tiniest fraction of a miraculous percent is the only way that that rifle could have fired and made the wound that we all saw on camera, then Tyler is not linked to the scene.
33:12And it is almost certain, it is entirely certain in my mind that this is a cover up and that it actually matches the pattern of political assassinations throughout time that are more often coverups than not.
33:27More often they're trying to blame it on a lone gunman when it clearly isn't than not.
33:36That's what this evidence would show, Nick.
33:39Duh.
33:40What would that be proof of?
33:43So you're you're insinuating a 306 will always have an exit wound or blow up a guy's head. If it didn't, it must have been >> No, like when you shoot a moose, it might not have an exit wound, though. It often does.
33:58If you were to shoot an elephant, it probably wouldn't have an exit wound.
34:02Maybe an elk, it could go through and through sometimes.
34:06And we, you know, we've got these new experts putting out photos of game with 30 sixes going through them. It's like, yeah, Charlie is not an elk. His neck is not an elk.
34:19different bullet. So, what did the FBI and France and Israel do? They brought the wrong gun.
34:26>> I love this part. Nick just keeps on because here's the thing is that Nick has such strong stances that he's elucidated so well for 10 years.
34:36It's a part of Nick's core identity, what he's based on. And he's waiting into waters here where he's undermining his own credibility on everything else, too.
34:48Did they bring the wrong gun? Let's let's listen a little more.
34:51>> Seriously, what's the alternative theory? So, there's a second shooter that shot him with the smaller caliber bullet. And when when France planted the rifle in the Palunteer Woods, they got the wrong rifle.
35:08Why did they do that?
35:11Well, Nick, if you were familiar with the JFK assassination, you would know that that's not necessarily unheard of because in the JFK assassination, they planted the wrong rifle. And researchers noticed that the rifle that had been presented to the public had the strap attachments on the side of the rifle. As you can see in the color photo right there, the strap attachments are on the side.
35:40And the rifle that Lee Harvey Oswald had, the strap attachments were on the bottom. And you can also see that in the advertisement for it in the magazine where the purchase was traced to, that the strap attachments were on the bottom. They were pretty close. They were pretty close to the right rifle, but little details matter. And in this photo, you can also clearly see that in the one that he owned, and his wife also confirmed this, if my memory serves, that the strap attachments were on the bottom and it did not match the rifle that they claimed was used. And I'm sure that because Nick is based about JFK, he
36:24knows all about the magic bullet and about how there were multiple shooters and about how there's no way that the shot that we all watch on the Zupruder film came from the Book Depository building, right, Nick?
36:47In fact, when you think about it, Nick, the act of getting the a pathy into place is a very hard thing to achieve. And I don't know how they do it. I don't know how they did it.
36:59But Tyler Robinson doesn't own some advanced scoped collapsible AR platform.
37:06They can't just force him to buy one. He owns a relic 300 6 that is an heirloom that will directly tie the rifle to Tyler.
37:16And so for whatever reason that was the rifle that was there.
37:22Maybe they would have been wiser to fire with a 306 round at Charlie Kirk, but for whatever reason they didn't want to do that, I guess. Or they couldn't. I don't know. See, that's the difference between you and me is I am not making assumptions based on things I don't know. I'll perfectly happily discuss things. I will explore theories and see what's what. But I don't know. If you ask me my concrete opinion about what really happened, I do not know.
37:48And I'm not claiming I do.
37:51I feel pretty confident about certain parts of the evidence. And I feel pretty confident about what we might not know and what we might know didn't happen.
38:00But I'm still waiting for you or any actual experts to present anything that seems credible and not absolutely bizarre and [ __ ] So this is a multi- agency, multilateral conspiracy involving French intelligence, Israeli intelligence, the FBI.
38:23You know, if Nick was based on the nuclear Deona facility, the Deona nuclear facility, he would actually remember how the French government and some people in South Africa and the Jewish mob in America, whole bunch of other folks all colluded to get Israel's nuclear facility up and running. It's not uncommon for a whole bunch of different nations and intelligence agencies and [ __ ] around the world to collude at a ve for very high level political and state operations.
38:56Duh. What are you talking about, Nick?
38:59Like, I don't know exactly what happened. We're just trying to investigate the actual evidence as opposed to shoveling the Fed slop narrative down people's throats and calling them names and saying they're dead to you and they're [ __ ] if they ask any questions.
39:13You would make a great journalist, Nick.
39:15>> The FBI produc >> And by journalist, I mean White House um correspondent >> the weapon.
39:23The FBI discovered the weapon. They produced it. They released photographs of it.
39:29>> Actually, Nick, they didn't. The FBI did not release photographs of the weapon.
39:33And to this day, we've never seen a photograph of the weapon. And in the charging documents that the government released charging Tyler Robinson with this crime, in those documents, they clearly state a flaw, a lie, an untruth that Tyler Robinson's father saw a photo of the rifle in the news and said, and then he knew that Tyler Robinson was the shooter, and that's how they then confronted him and convinced him to turn himself in.
40:04>> [snorts] >> The problem with that is that the photo we are referring to of this gun published by the New York Post is not the rifle that Tyler Robinson owned. And that's obvious because this is a composite plastic sort of stock. This is not a World War I relic. Duh.
40:24And the New York Post clarified that that this was just a stock image of a similar rifle that they used as a standin because the FBI has never published a photo of the actual rifle from the crime.
40:39Pretty important detail for you to know about, Nick. Pretty important detail when you read the charging documents.
40:46Pretty important detail for the whole thing.
40:51Yeah, it's kind of awkward in concert with with the Egyptian military that deployed their shooters. There's Israeli phones there and they got the wrong gun. They matched a wrong gun to the wrong bullet. How does that even make sense?
41:09I guess they [ __ ] up.
41:13How How does 911 make sense?
41:16We know what we know about 911 because they [ __ ] up.
41:20How about JFK? They [ __ ] up.
41:25How about the USS Liberty? We only know what happened because they [ __ ] up.
41:31Duh.
41:35It's a three agency conspiracy, but they brought the wrong rifle. And how did they do that?
41:42They picked one at random.
41:45Most of these conspiracies have some serious retards involved that seriously [ __ ] up and leave a trail of clues lying around. That's very common. What kind of bullet did they shoot him with? A a handgun. Why did they >> I don't know because they haven't told us. And they won't release any information. They're actually actively suppressing information and covering everything up. And they paved over the crime scene and all this other [ __ ] We don't know, Nick. I doubt it was a handgun cuz handguns are hard to aim. I'm sure you know that because I'm sure you shot a lot of guns.
42:16>> Leave a handgun in the woods.
42:19It doesn't make any sense. Your theory?
42:24>> I don't have a theory, Nick. My theory is that your theory is [ __ ] [ __ ] You're the one with the theory, Nick.
42:32You're the one pumping a theory, and it's the Cash Patel theory.
42:39I am the one poking holes in it and saying, "Nope, not good enough. Let's look at real evidence, please."
42:48>> Which you don't even have. All you have is this. Oh, we're just asking question.
42:52>> Correct. Yes, that's what journalists do. They ask questions until a credible theory emerges. And so far, no credible theory has emerged. You are correct, Nick. You're almost there. Keep going.
43:04Maybe you'll get there. It's >> so stupid. It's completely stupid.
43:10>> I think he's just gonna go >> kind of >> and I'm going to have to wind up doing a video about it >> and I'm >> Please do, Nick. Please do. That will be a wonderful day.
43:23>> Going to rip it apart and I'm not anybody that disagreed like you're dead to me. Straight up.
43:30>> You hear that, Gripers?
43:32If you have any questions about anything that your fearless leader says, you're dead to him. [ __ ] you, you [ __ ] [ __ ] Personally, I don't think that's a great way to think or feel about other people.
43:45I'm of the mindset that you should think for yourself. And you don't have to like me or like my theories. I don't care. Do your thing, dude. Look your own [ __ ] up.
43:53Come up with your own ideas. You can even call me a fed. You can do whatever you want. That's fine. You're still good with me.
44:01I ain't stressed.
44:05Duh.
44:07>> Because you're a sucker. If you fell for this, you're too stupid. We don't need you. You're a victim of the matrix.
44:15So, a lot of your fans got banned. Not a good look. I don't want them.
44:21Nick is being forced to continually respond to this over and over and over and just like make more and more mistakes because his own fans are sending him super chats being like, "Nick, this is not a good look, bro.
44:30Nick, you should not don't keep doing this, Nick. You're [ __ ] you're [ __ ] it up, Nick."
44:36And he's like banning them. He's deleting chats and [ __ ] It's awkward.
44:43I don't want them. if you're pushing on this. I don't I'm not like these other people where I'm >> And to clarify, I haven't banned anyone over this conversation. I I think I've hardly ever banned anyone at all. I've banned a few back in the day when I was smaller on Twitter. Um but [snorts] around this conversation, haven't banned anyone. Haven't deleted any comments.
45:01Haven't done any manipulation of any conversations in my feeds or in my um in my zone because it's all good. Talk your [ __ ] Bring it on. begging people to watch my show. I don't want If you don't, if you don't like that, don't watch it. I swear to God, go somewhere else. I shouldn't say I swear to God, but seriously, you want to be, you know, I've said this before, go watch Num Nuts. Go watch Can Owens. You're into the soap opera. I think Nick should probably work on his insult game. Should probably come up with better nicknames for people. Maybe call up Trump and ask him for some advice.
45:38Go watch that because when push comes to shove, you're going to be a liability. I don't need liabilities. I don't need idiots around me. Don't need liabilities. A Nick, maybe you should have had a more thoughtful past.
45:58But not going to get [snorts] into all that. I'll let other people on the internet dig into Nick Flint's past.
46:07So [sighs] that's Nick Fuentes's most recent let's I guess we'll not say crash out we'll say response and there's my response that's how I feel about it that's just a little bit of evidence to talk about it talk about Phoenix ammunition talk about Jean Franis and you make up your own mind think for yourself do your own research look into their [snorts] arguments maybe do some research about skin and bullets bouncing off a skin or whatever, whatever floats your boat. Think for yourself. Come to your own conclusions.
46:42And you're welcome to tune in next time, whether you love me, hate me, agree with me, disagree with me, whatever it is, Nick, please don't stop.
46:53Like, it's it's greatly benefiting to me for you to continue. So, selfishly, I would ask you, please don't stop. Um, if I was your friend, but I'm being told by credible sources that I'm not your friend anymore. Um, if I was your friend, I would probably tell you to log off and take a few deep breaths and deal with whatever is going on in your personal life because you look stressed, bro. And genuinely, this is a genuine statement from here on out. No more sarcasm. [snorts] Um, you're important and your voice is important. It's very important and you're very smart and um and I genuinely miss where you were at before or at
47:36least where it appeared like you were at. And you have every opportunity to be a huge player in the American political conversation for good. Um I think maybe um at least for genuinely you. But this does not feel like genuinely you to me.
47:55And I don't think it feels like genuinely you to a huge portion of your audience and to a huge portion of the people that have not made their mind up about you yet. And I think it's a huge mistake. Um, and obviously you're not going to listen to me. And maybe this will even want make you want to youthfully reject it, rebel, and be even more of a whatever this is.
48:18But I uh yeah, whatever. You do you, man. That's all for today. Thanks for watching. Um I'd appreciate if you like the video, subscribe to the channel, all the things that help out. And let me know in the comments if you agree with me, if you agree with Nick, if you think I'm a dumbass, if you think he's a dumbass, if you want me to deliver you a pizza, whatever it is, dog. Um drop it in the comments. Um give give us your best.
48:42Let's give give us here in the comments.
48:45You know what? in the comments. Give your best roast of Ian Carol, please. Um whether you love me or hate me, just drop the drop the best roast of Ian Carol in the comments and let's just have a little fun at the end of this cuz it's crazy out here and let's just get let's get loose, okay? Cuz [ __ ] it, life is short. Um politics is [ __ ] crazy and this conversation is a bunch of slop. So do your worst. I'll see you on the other side. Conspiracy theories are entering [music] a danger.
49:18>> Information is the oxygen of a democracy.
49:21>> There's so much evidence out there that even if less than 1% is true, that will be enough to collapse the current paradigm and change the whole planet.
Read the essay version →