Tyler Robinson’s Gun COULDN’T SHOOT! Frog Gut Bacteria Cures Cancer!

0:14Hey, hey, hey.

0:36Heat. Heat.

1:15Hey, Heat. Heat.

1:52Hey, hey, hey.

2:17Heat. Heat.

2:43Hey hey hey.

2:51Hey Heat. Hey. Hey. Hey.

3:30Come on.

3:32Come on.

3:57I got a d Yeah.

4:30Yeah. Yeah.

5:25It's going to be Wow. Wow.

8:22Sh.

8:43Happy.

8:51Hey. Hey.

8:56Heat. Heat.

9:16Heat. Heat.

9:38Heat. Heat.

9:47Heat.

10:00Heat.

10:08Heat. Heat. N.

10:18Heat. Heat.

10:28Heat. Heat. N.

10:55Uh hey a hey.

11:18Ooh, hey.

11:44Huh?

12:01Hey. Hey.

12:112.

12:25Hey, ah.

12:48you. Let's go live on Jim and D.

12:52>> Jim Jam, you're live. Hi everybody.

12:53>> Jimmy, can you take those ear things out unless you want them?

12:56>> Yeah. You know, these are the new kind of headphones, right? that the earbuds that they don't go inside your ear, which is why I like them. And so, um, um, people always think they're hearing aids. Isn't that funny? Everywhere I go, people go, "Huh?"

13:11>> I walked into the co I walked into a comedy club and the one of the guys who's worked in the office goes, "Hey, Jimmy. Uh, uh, you know, I'm looking for hearing aids. What kind are?" And I'm like, "These these are earbuds." The do I went to an ENT doctor. He goes, "Is that those hearing aids?" And I'm like, "No, these are Well, I think I see a flaw in their design for t taking. It's like those sunglasses that clip over real glasses that when those came out and those old people wear them to the mall.

13:39>> Did you see that? I I sent I sent the team an article, a clip that says that um they released earpods uh Apple's shocking patent exposed AirPods that can read your thoughts.

13:52>> Yes.

13:53>> Yeah. We did this on a premium streamium three years ago. This was at the W.

13:58They have the technology >> and monitor your brain in real time.

14:01>> What they're saying is that those Airbuds um just look for brain activity for some reason. It seems suspicious. They're like, "No, no, we're just making sure you're not dead." Really? Why would my Why would my earbuds want to know if I'm not dead? Who what >> um they said >> they have that technology.

14:20>> They said they're going to sell it this way.

14:22>> That's what she said. Brain health. the lady who from the W giving the the speech with that animation. Remember the lady wears earbuds and she gets like uh >> it was crazy. Your boss can make sure you're focusing.

14:33>> You are you are Yes. And they can know what you're focusing on.

14:37>> So they we know they have this technology and so the it's now the quickening is h this is it is all happening at once. You are going you are going to live in a 15minute city. you are going to be uh surveiled 24/7. You already are by the way cuz I saw another post and I have to look into it that your your cell phone >> has been recording you even when you don't know it and it's all being logged and there's a link I have to I haven't clicked on the link. It said here here's the link. Click and put in your number and they have all these recordings of you. I I could totally believe it. I haven't.

15:18>> Okay. You you know this is an old story I'm going to tell you right now. You know remember Pokemon Go where you'd your phone you'd be hunting Pokemon?

15:25Yes.

15:25>> And it was real popular and and people were getting hit by cars trying to get a rare Pokemon.

15:29>> I remember that.

15:31>> Well, that company what they were doing was uh mapping out every like square inch of everything and the rare Pokemon would be in spots. It's hard to spy on to get that information. So all that aluminum spray they've been geoengineering on top of us. idiots playing Pokemon Go gave them all the rest of the information. And this was an old I remember hearing this story and just forgetting about it.

15:52>> What was what was the point of it again?

15:54The Pokemon tell me I >> they mapped out every inch of everything.

15:57>> Oh, you understand?

15:58>> Oh yeah, I got you.

16:00>> Okay, so and then now with geo fencing, I was watching a video before about like why you can't get away with murder in 2026, which by the way, I beg to differ.

16:09>> I beg to differ.

16:10>> Uh but you you I can't and you can't.

16:13That's why because we're geoenced like how Israel watches what they're saying at churches.

16:17>> Yeah.

16:18>> Geo fences them in. See where they're coming in and out and whatever. So yeah.

16:21No, they it's um >> they've every single thing everyone's been using has already built the machine. I could already tell when Twitter looked like a crazy person's brain years ago. That's what everyone's been doing.

16:32>> That's what it looks like.

16:34>> Oh, you know I'm not a robot. You know, you got to put tell point to the motorcycle if you're not a robot.

16:39>> Yeah. How many pe How many people responding with ridiculous establishment talking points and pro-Israel talking points have a name like uh uh Gunther 56498 uh Joey 64222? It's like what what who puts numbers in their uh >> someone not putting in the effort Jimmy that yes >> with I'm not a robot. It was to train AI. So when you when it goes point to the pictures of fire hydrants here so I know you're not a robot that you have to do.

17:09>> What you're doing is training an AI to recognize the fire hydrants better.

17:13>> And that was actually people secretly training AI as well.

17:17>> Okay. Well uh we're in it's a brave new world. It's uh it's 1984.

17:24It's worse than you thought. And yes they can control the weather. We're going to talk about that in a second.

17:29But I first I want to get to there more bad news for TPUSA. You remember this?

17:34Nobody showed up to see Erica Kirk talk in Georgia. Remember this?

17:39>> I I I it doesn't bother me when he speaks on issues today. Frankly, even when I disagree with how he's applying, >> even the vice president. So, that just shows you that they've lost at least 70% of their support. The Trump uh administration, nobody shows up to even hear JD Vance. Um >> Oh, that's the night that the lights went out in Georgia, Jimmy.

18:01>> That is. And so, guess what? The president of Turning Point University of Georgia chapter is resigning due to the uh internal treatment and subsequent public lies told by Turning Point executives surrounding Erica Kirk's last minute cancellation of the event. So remember Erica Kirk didn't show and they said it was because she had death threats. Well, we now find out she was there and that that was all made up. Wait, she was at the thing >> that that's she was in Georgia. So they said they said they said, "Oh, no, the death threats weren't at the stadium.

18:37The death threats were at her were um with her travel." Right.

18:41>> So she last minute decided not to go, I guess, because she was already there >> because no. So let's keep reading what Candace has to say. In short, the excuse pedled by their public relations team was pure fiction, as we all suspected.

18:53No, the left was not buying up tons of reservations. Is that what they said?

18:58>> That's what Andrew Kulich said that the left, they bought all those tickets so nobody would shut that didn't happen.

19:05>> To the contrary, the team knew weeks before there was little interest in the event for a variety of reasons and Erica's safety was never an issue.

19:14Beyond this, the questions at the event were entirely faked. Erica, as we reported, was already in Georgia.

19:25Now both of the Secret Service and the UG chapter president is claiming that Turning Point not only lied but rather extraordinarily blamed the public because Erica didn't want to hit the stage. And uh so it makes you wonder if the if the head of the TPUSA uh Georgia chapter acted on purely moral grounds or did she simply refuse to wear the aluminum foil jumpsuit and come out to fireworks? Evidently, the requirement for all positions of leadership in that organization requires a jumpsuit and fireworks. There it is. Uh Turning Point USA campus leader quits after Erica the per the president of the university.

20:08Vance drew an abysmal crowd to his campus. Uh only a quarter full Turning Point CEO Erica Kirk was scheduled to appear at the event, but at the last minute she didn't show up. Carolyn Maddox, the chapter's former president, wrote in her resignation letter that joining TPUSA had been a dream of hers.

20:26But after its founder, Kirk died last year, the right-wing organization's mission has become dishonest.

20:33She noted that after Vance's visit, it had become abundantly clear to her that TPUSA's mission and purpose have been lost along the way.

20:45freedom turning point >> was the mission to get uh wives to stay home and take care of the kids because I would say yes >> now that his wife took over the business and is not staying home with the kids.

20:57>> So here's her letter right uh Turning Point was found to promote truth, fight for conservative values, encourage independent thought and defend free speech. However, it became abundantly clear to me following the event April 14th that TP's USA mission has been lost along the way. It became evident to me the organ current direction no longer aligns with the principles upon which it was founded. I witnessed firsthand what I believe to be an organization's true direction following Charlie's passion and I have a significance and concerns in its messaging and its current trajectory. In light of this, I'm resigning. Charlie

21:29spent his lives fighting for truth and I do not believe he would stand for the blatant dishonesty now being spread by the organization that he built. His mission was never about numbers, appearances, or relevance. He showed people the beauty of just having a conversation and inspired a generation to make a change. His mission was never about performing, but about encouraging my generation and future generations to stand up for what is right and to fight for America. Wow. Pretty strong stuff.

21:57Uh, you know, when I was starting out in comedy, I would come out to rooms that were sparsely crowded. Uh, it made me want to quit, but the the nachos were so good in the green room, I just had to come back. Is that what where did you start?

22:11>> Andrew Kulit, who took over Charlie's podcast after he was shot and killed last year, tried to spin the low turnout by claiming it was left-wing protesters who had infiltrated the event by reserving tickets, which somehow resulted in hardly anybody bothering to show up.

22:24>> What >> uh some college chapters have previously expressed similar sentiments to Maddox is the way the TPS chapter in Arkansas disbanded after Erica visited it last month. The chapter's former president, Dino, whatever his name, Fantrosi, echoed, sounds like an Iranian. Uh, Maddox's grievances and said Arkansas's chapter members were put off by how Charlie Kirk had been used by TPUSA since his assassination. Vance's visit to Georgia and Erica's no-shows also prompted TPUSA to change course for its spring tour in which conservative personalities debate college students.

23:03At the most recent stop on the tour in Baylor University in Waco, Texas, all media were denied access to the event.

23:10This is the opposite of Charlie Kirk.

23:12TPUSA said the press restrictions were due to the venue they rented, but Baylor said it was clear about expectations with TPUSA from the beginning. Um, Turning Point USA chapter Turning Point officially collapsed after disasters.

23:27Yes, it has. Uh, the truth be So, here it is. Here's the woman.

23:33Uh, the most damning evidence, the US Secret Service took the unusual step of issuing statements confirming there was no credible threat against Kirk that night. If there had been a viable threat, Vice President Vance would have never been allowed to take the stage, but he did. The receipts are in. Turning Point didn't just lose a chapter president. They lost their credibility 100%. Um, the resignation letter written by the University of Georgia's Turning Point chapter president is worth reading. Though I doubt she will ever she will ever receive an apology from anyone on the executive team. We can at

24:05least share and hope that JD Vance sees it classy and wellstated. I can't explain how much it breaks my heart to see what this organization has become.

24:15Fully elitist, everything Charlie resented. Do you know how many small half-filled events me and Charlie did early on? Charlie would have been on that stage. It was about It wasn't about the crowd size to him. And then here's Blake Nef. Everything Charlie resented.

24:31What Charlie would resent is a narcissistic psychopath. I think he's looking in the mirror and and Erica standing next to him. Because a narcissistic psychopath is Blake Nef, Andrew Kulovit, the amazing Mikey McCoy, and Erica Kirk. What Charlie would reset harassing harassing a widow. We're not harassing a widow. We're pointing out that the head of one of the biggest and most powerful political organizations in the country is a fraud.

25:04>> By the way, harassing his widow. Oh, the kindly old lady up on the hill. She's going to her house and the wears a sparkly suit and runs a political organization. It takes in millions of dollars. you.

25:14>> Yeah, exactly. Could you imagine if uh uh Jackie O took over the DNC the day after JFK was shot and everybody was like, "Hey, you can't criticize her."

25:27Can you imag No, you can't. You can't.

25:28You imagine that? That would be hilariously ridiculous. Uh but let's just show you just how much uh the uh TPUSA is completely bastardizing and changing and perverting Charlie Kirk's message just around the Iran war. Right now a lot of people think that he was killed because he was standing in the way of the Iran war. U that certainly was a big part of it. And let's listen.

25:54Iran does have a conventional military.

25:56They are a proud and they are a big country. possible case scenario is Iran says, "Okay, you humiliated us. You killed all of our leaders.

26:05We're going to go make this a regional mess and try to get as many people involved as possible. They're going to go after Americans. They're going to go after Saudis. They're going to go after everybody imaginable just to create a big mess and to try to draw the world into it." Because understand the Iranian people are widely respected and not necessarily >> You never hear that. You never hear that. The Iranian people are widely respected. You never hear that. Here we go.

26:30>> Always in sync with leadership. But if and when the people of Iran feel like Persia is being defaced and humiliated and disrespected, we don't know where that is going to go. And that's my final reason why I am always skeptical of military intervention. And when a lot of the sometimes wararmongering wing gets too excited, you don't know. Actually, you need to have a lot of humility. And here's what they're saying now after Charlie's dead and the war is going full speed.

27:01>> He also always did have trust with the president and he would look for the bright side of things and he was an American patriot. So he would pray for our success once that began. And I just want to >> so once the he'd be vehemently again he would go to the White House and scream at the top of his lungs about Trump and tell him not to start the war but once it did he would go yeah okay I'm on board. That's according to this This >> yo I know I know somebody who who you know he told me that he he was like he knew him and he couldn't believe he's like yo he told Trump not to go to Iraq.

27:35You believe that? Like he couldn't believe the balls of him >> where I'm like well I would have said that. I but apparently that's a lot of cojones. I guess it is cuz he got murdered for it. Yeah. I guess it is a lot of work. Of >> course he did because Charlie Kirk knew the only thing that he had that was worth anything was his credibility. And Donald Trump was about to ruin his credibility because he supported him for president as a peace president and he's doing the exact opposite. So of course he's going to do that. He's going to scream at the top of his lungs because you're wrecking my credibility and what

28:06do I have except that? So there's more.

28:08Listen to these morons. Kurt >> ought to offer perspective on how I think he would have felt about this.

28:15And that's not to use Charlie as a shield. That is not to use say everything just revolves around him.

28:22>> That's exactly what they're doing.

28:24They're trying to use Charlie as a shield for this war >> cuz he's not with us anymore. But I know people, all of us are feeling the lack of Charlie in a moment like this because he was a natural >> I don't know if you could see that it says keep pressure up. Regime change in Iran would be a catastrophe. That's Charlie Kirk and these guys are saying the exact opposite.

28:45>> Leader of the movement.

28:46>> Well, I think that's also like as soon as all this broke out.

28:49>> This is the amazing Mikey McCoy.

28:51>> You saw that social media immediately went to go find Charlie clips because he still is even in death like the leading voice on a matter like this.

29:00>> Well, and I'm sorry. Go ahead. No, I was just gonna say and it makes me upset though because for these people that didn't actually know Charlie like like you said it in private he would be not happy with the situation and he he would express his thoughts. You would often times see him talk about on the show but then as soon as this would happen he would >> he would come out and flip completely and lie to his audience. That's what they're saying the president. He would try to calm people down. And so it's really irritating for me to see so many people on social media.

29:31>> As Kurt just said, if Charlie Kirk was willing to do what the amazing Mikey McCoy just said, he would still be alive.

29:40>> Like that's he didn't do the thing that you wanted him to do the one time. and and so they killed him.

29:45>> The opposite reaction to use his voice to actually cause chaos, to actually cause fear of the situation, to actually cause hatred of of President Trump in in this whole ordeal when actually that's not what he would want.

29:58>> Friday night, Shabbat shalom.

30:02>> Stop.

30:05Veil in due time.

30:06>> I am so excited.

30:07>> Yeah.

30:08>> Stop.

30:12So that's from Phantom Pain. And Phantom Pain says, "The dead man's name is being used to sanctify Israel's war machine.

30:19This is not remembrance. This is desecration."

30:23That's exactly right.

30:25>> I mean, unbelievable. He wouldn't spread chaos and fear. You just said that this lion was under threat of assassination, >> right?

30:33>> And just >> who's spreading chaos and fear?

30:36>> When they'd say if you like Trump, you're a terrorist automatically. You remember that? You're you're doing it right now.

30:41>> Everything that TPUSA says is a projection. Every criticism they have of Candace Owens or anybody looking for the truth is a psychological projection. And it's obvious. And uh I've got some hilarious jokes about TPUSA and Erica Kirk. And you should come see me in Burbank, California, May 7th. Tulsa, Oklahoma City. Hey, May 23rd and May 20.

31:05Uh we're going to be in Atlanta, Georgia, May 23rd. May 24th will be in Raleigh, North Carolina. Or do you say rally? North Carolina.

31:14That's that's coming up quick. So that's Atlanta Rally or Raleigh or relie. Uh at Spokane Doug and then Tacoma and then Levittown, New York, June 26th and 27th at Governor's uh go to jimmy.com for a link for tickets. Over to Steph.

31:32>> Okay.

31:32>> I say relief by the way.

31:34>> You say relief. Nice.

31:36>> Uh, I have a C2C2.

31:39Message received. Wink wink. Thank you so much.

31:44>> Happy Israel Friday. Stomach worm.

31:47My goodness. She's a filthy >> Oh my god.

31:52>> My fixer.

31:54She's a trad wife. Uh, Charlie and TPUSA never stood for honesty. Billionaire funded talking points spouted to teenagers for a profit. Universal Earthling are dating.

32:07>> Okay, ready to >> uh remember what Zigg Ziggnoo Brinski said who was the adviser to Jimmy Carter. He started the trilateral commission. He's the father of uh Mika Brzinski on Morning Joe Ball and >> Big News I think is how you pronounce it. It's a big news Brzinski. He said technology will make available to the leaders of major nations techniques for conducting secret warfare of which only a bare minimum of the security forces need be appraised. Techniques of weather modification could be employed to produce prolonged periods of drought or storm. Well, son of a gun, we've got evidence that that's exactly what

32:46they've been doing in Iran. Iranian expert accuses US Israel of weather manipulation to deepen the drought. An Iranian water resource specialist has accused the United States and Israel of manipulating regional weather patterns to intensify Iran's severe drought.

33:05According to the Middle Eastern Media Research Institute, uh they claimed in a July 30th interview on the Iranian YouTube channel that both nations had been deliberately diverting clouds away from Iran for over four decades.

33:22>> Well, that's a violation of the treaty not to do that, Jimmy. That is there there's a there's a treaty international treaty that was signed in the 70s that's that made it illegal or they all agreed to not use weather modification >> cuz we did it in Vietnam too.

33:34>> Because we did it in Vietnam. Iran's rain clouds aren't being sto stolen but its drought is worsening. So So the establishment media comes out immediately tries to uh make you think that's wrong. That's not happening because that's what the establishment media does. Is is Iran being forced to use their plague of bees weapon on Israel in retaliation?

33:54>> Iran's embassy in Kabool posted a strange tweet. They say in it, "After Iran destroyed the secret center for cloud seeding and weather manipulation in the United Arab Emirates, everything changed overnight. And with the end of the secret center, the region's weather map flipped completely.

34:12So, uh, this is we it's raining so much their their reservoirs were down to 1%.

34:20They were thinking of they would have to move people out of Tran, a city of 9 or 10 million. They had to they were going to move everybody because they had no water. But now we open the gates of Iraq's largest uh dam due to 100% capacity. The dam hasn't reached 100% capacity in years. underground water sauces have started to overflow. And this is what it looks like.

34:47That's what it looks like now in Iran.

34:50Water everywhere.

34:53Water coming up from under the ground.

34:58Uh and here uh Iran destroyed American.

35:01So when Iran hit uh they say they destroyed their weather modification plants, right? when when Iran was hitting uh um all the Gulf states because we had bases there and then they were they also took out their weather weather modification. This is what the reporting is, right? So I I can't nobody can confirm this for sure, but this is certainly what it looks like and especially after Iran Kabul tweeted that out. Here's what Tucker Carlson and our good friend Dane Winningington had to say about it.

35:32>> And Tucker, they're being used as a form of warfare. And we know that we have countries like Iran constantly demonized. Of course, as you well know, immediately after 9/11, we have the list of countries to be targeted given to General Wesley Clark.

35:49A list that clearly existed before 9/11 even occurred. Subsequently, every one of those countries, every one of them was endured a once in 1,000-year drought. Statistically, mathematically, that's impossible without climate intervention operations. And we have the leader of Iran on the floor of the UN on film on the record stating NATO was cutting off their precipitation. We have Iranian top scientists recently stating NATO's been doing this for 40 years.

36:14Destabilize the food supply by destabilizing the rain and you destabilize the population.

36:21>> Here's more from Dne.

36:23>> I'm saying that we know the technology exists to steer storms of that size. So why would we think they're not using these type of operations? We have historical precedent. Project Papey in Vietnam was so successful at controlling precipitation by 1976 they passed the INMOD treaties forbidding weather manipulation for wartime purposes but not over a country's own population. The Chinese government has long since openly stated they were engineering snowstorms with endothermic reacting elements.

36:50These are patented elements that can literally transition a rain event into snow. They were so successful in China, they caused billions of dollars of damage to Beijing, at which time they began to be less open about this.

37:01Everybody covered it. CNN, Popular Science, The Guardian. But if you bring that up here, suddenly you're a tin foil hatw wearing nutcase.

37:10>> Uh, and if you want to hear testimony in Congress, this is this is real. This is from C-SPAN. Uh, here's testimony in Congress talking about how the Navy has been doing this. Hang on.

37:24Thank you, Senator. The Air Force has gotten great value out of the past.

37:27>> The Air Force, sorry. Here we go.

37:30>> Thank you, Senator. The Air Force has gotten great value out of HARP in the past. We took over from the >> So, he's talking about HARP. That's the program to do weather modification and shoot energy into the ionosphere.

37:43>> We managed it and actually did a number of uh experiment campaigns up there and uh have finished our our work that we were interested in doing up there. We've uh moving on to other ways of uh managing the ionosphere which the heart was really designed to do was to inject energy into the ionosphere be able to actually control it and but that work is has been completed.

37:57>> Mr. Another question on the >> so they already they got it figured out how to control the ionosphere. That's is what he just said. Okay, here's more. In an interview with the Los Angeles Times on April 21st, you said that the you told the Associated Press that the American government has created weather tampering techniques so that the new world order will be able to starve millions of Americans and to control the rest. Would you explain what you were trying to say?

38:22>> Well, it what I was trying to say is exactly what I said. There is weather control techniques. We have a complete package on that which I did not bring, but I certainly will see to it that it is brought in for the record. Number one, the entire patents on the equipment. Number two, Senator Claybourne Pel's complete statement and story of his own that not only does it exist, but that we even utilize it as far back as the Vietnam War. You might want to touch base with Senator.

38:40>> I just want to repeat before turn.

38:43You're saying the government has created weather tampering techniques so that the quote new world order will be able to serve millions of Americans worldwide.

38:51>> Millions of Americans and to control the rest.

38:53>> Yes, sir. And that's my belief. As bizarre as that sounds, when if somebody had told me that that equipment even existed 10 years ago, I would have thought they were nuts, sir. And at this point in time, we have all the documents to prove it. And if you think that 85 tornadoes takes place in the middle of our growing area by simultaneous accident, I'm I'm sorry. With the equipment that's already set up internationally and as bizarre as that is, it is proven and documented. We will supply you with those documents. As bizarre as that is, I would say that weather wars and this is quoting actually Senator Clay Pel himself that

39:19they are the greatest weapon ever created in the world. And that's the senator's own statement. So yes, that deduce me to that.

39:23>> Thank you, Mr.

39:25>> Uh here's a little bit more.

39:26Geoengineering allows militaries to command and control the battlefield to throw communication signals much further and more efficiently in an ionized atmosphere. So power profit and then the most troubling one and it's this is very hard for people to get population control >> you might call population control >> to control the weather and he who controls the weather will control the world.

39:51>> So that's LBJ.

39:53He who controls the weather will control the world.

39:57>> Always.

39:57>> It dawned on me many years ago that the official story we've been presented with about what is called climate change, it seems to be incomplete at best. Few in the civil sector fully understand that geoengineering is primarily a military science and has nothing to do with either cooling the planet or lowering carbon emissions. When they say we're waging war on carbon dioxide, they're literally, as you just said, waging war on life itself, this transhumanist impulse to merge the human species with the machines and technologies that we've created. Breathing consciously and strategically is the portal into more

40:39mindfulness. I think really awakening to our potential as humans. For those humans who don't believe, as you said earlier, in geoengineering, please understand that there are literally tens of thousands of pages of public records all over the world indicating ongoing weather manipulation and climate modification projects for almost 100 years.

41:06>> So there you go. Uh that's what happened. So they they use these highpowered um well let me you know what um hey go to steps for just a second.

41:20Let me show you something.

41:24Okay it's coming. Hold on. It is coming.

41:27Um is this it? Yes.

41:32You know you may not be aware of this.

41:44Let me play this for you.

41:46>> You know, you may not be aware of this, but uh Thrron was almost made uninhabitable by drought. And the drought was engineered in part by US radar systems that were blasting energy to ionize the atmosphere to steer clouds away from Iran and to actually cause a drought. It's just classic geoengineering, multiple ways to achieve this. But what has happened is that since those large radar installations around the Persian Gulf have been destroyed by Iranian drones, the rains have returned. And now in the last week or so, we have really record rains in Thran and what was almost uninhabitable.

42:16I mean, >> so there So I I don't know how much more you need to hear about this, but it's real. It happened. It we've we've already used it. Operation Popey that everybody knows, which led to a treaty in the 70s saying we wouldn't use this anymore. And you don't have a treaty for a weapon system that doesn't exist. You have a treaty for a weapon system that not only exists, but it's already been used and proven that it works and it we did it in Vietnam and we've been doing it. Why do you think they ever stopped?

42:47Because they didn't and they've ramped it up. Um, okay, that's it. We um and if you'd like to hear my jokes about this and my jokes about climate change, which I have a bunch, come see me May 7th.

43:00What's up, Kurt? Oh, so Rogan just texted me. So on X, they're all going, "No, they've had the same rainfall for five years."

43:08>> They're all on their line.

43:10>> Is it all somebody named Joey 5643281?

43:13>> Yeah. Is their last name that put a a witz or a feld on the end of those numbers and then you know you >> So come see me tell jokes about this in Burbank, California. Tulsa, Oklahoma, Oklahoma City. We're going to be May 23rd we'll be in Atlanta, Georgia. May 24th in Raleigh, North Carolina. and then Spokane, Tacoma, and Levittown, New New York at Governor's in June 26th and 27th. Go to jimmy.com for a link for tickets. All right, we're going to take a break because we have a special guest on big breakthroughs in cancer treatment that they don't want you to know about, which is actually happening. We'll be

43:47right back. All right, Kurt, we'll All right, quick break to talk about something I've just started using.

43:53Rumble wallet. If you've ever been curious about buying and investing in crypto, Bitcoin, stable coins, USAT, or even goldback stable coins, but felt like it was too complicated, Rumble Wallet is an easy way to get started.

44:10You can buy, sell, and manage your cryptocurrencies all in one place, and the app is super straightforward. What really makes Rumble Wallet unique is that you can use it to tip your favorite creators like me and support the Freedom First community we've built here on Rumble. Getting started is simple. Just download the Rumble wallet app, sign up with your existing Rumble account, no need for a new login, complete a few security steps, and you're set up in minutes. So you can start with just a few dollars and with Moon Pay built into Rumble Wallet, you can easily buy crypto using your credit card, debit card, or

44:48bank wire. So if you've been thinking about the advantages of crypto, download Rumble Wallet now. Click my link in the description or search Rumble Wallet in your app store. Download Rumble Wallet today and move your assets to where they belong, in your hands and in your control. Rumble wallet is a technology provider only and not a custodial service. See terms atwallet.rumble.com Hey, two facts, one conclusion. Fact one, the US Treasury's own financial report shows the government has 6 trillion in assets and 47 trillion in liabilities, plus 88 trillion more in Social Security and Medicare promises it

46:18cannot keep. $136 trillion, the textbook definition of insolvent.

46:25And US debt and gold prices have moved in 90% correlation since 2021. The market already sees it. Fact two, in 2025, global gold demand crossed 5,000 tons for the first time in history.

46:40Investment demand surged 84% to an all-time record. Americans doubled their gold holdings and supply mine production grew mine production grew just 1%.

46:53Physical delivery delays are already hitting 4 to 8 weeks. The conclusion when a government prints its way through insolveny, paper weakens, and real assets surge. The window to act be before supply becomes the headline is right now, not after the next price record. Monetary gold 26 years 50,000 clients a better business bureau every fee shown upfront before you spend a scent. Call 8004767790 or go to jimmyloves.com for your complimentary gold and silver guide.

47:288004767790 or jimmyloves.com.

47:33The numbers don't lie. Act before they do.

47:37Heat. Heat.

48:17Hey, we have special guests. Nicholas Holshire is an epidemiologist, an administrator at the McCulla Foundation who earned his mers in public health from the University of Michigan. He's a prolific researcher with over 25 publications serving as a lead author on significant studies regarding CO 19 vaccine injuries, myocarditis, postacute I can't say that word. He his work focuses on bringing complex scientific data with public understanding to advocate for medical freedom and evidence-based health decisions. Welcome to the show, Nicholas. How are you?

48:52>> I'm great. Thanks for having me.

48:54>> I appreciate you uh showing up. know, uh, I follow you on Twitter and I saw this. You said the US government cancer data just dropped. Overall cancers in those under 50 jumped 6.4% from 2021 to 2023 during mass MRA uptakes. Brain ter tumors increased 19%. Colon rectal cancers 19.4%. Small intestine cancer 15.5%.

49:22Ovarian cancer. Stomach cancer. I know someone who just died of stomach cancer, uh, breast cancer, and, um, and here's from your Substack. Breaking US government cancer data shows early onset cancer surged 6.4% 4%. Uh, in a 30-month populationwide analysis of 296,000 residents of Pascara Province, Italy, individuals who received at least one dose of the CO 19 vaccine showed a 23% higher likelihood of hospitalization for cancer of any site compared with the unvaccinated.

49:59Risks were particularly elevated for colarctyl, breast, and bladder cancer.

50:04And I went and I wanted to check this out. So uh uh first of all, there's the first this is the first population study uh that showed an increase in cancer.

50:15Here's the study. A one-year risk of cancer is associated with CO 19 vaccination.

50:21Large population-based cohort study.

50:24They did it in South Korea and they found that the uh co 19 could be associated with an increased risk of six specific cancers. the ones we just told you. So, um, but this So, let me bring in Nick Licholas. Tell me, how could this possibly be true and is why is this not being widely reported?

50:46>> Yeah, this should be front page news absolutely everywhere. And so, what's key though about the most recent US government cancer data dump is that we were waiting for it for like four years, right? So that was just 2023 data that just dropped, but this was the gold standard cancer surveillance system called SEIR, which stands for surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program. And so that basically just gives the US cancer incidents data, how many people, how many new cases of cancer, you know, per year. And it it's very worrisome. And what what just dropped confirms what we've been worried

51:27about, you know, for the past 5 years that the mRNA injections were indeed inducing cancer. And so, yeah, it jumped in those under 50 years old from 2021 to 2023, you know, 6.4% overall. And that's a pretty big jump. That's tens of thousands of extra cancer cases that should not be occurring in these age groups. and you laid it out earlier, brain tumors were up 19% in those under n in those under 50 years old. Um, central nervous system tumors, breast cancer, stomach cancer. Um, all these cancers were were high, but the biggest one was colon cancer 19% higher. And yeah, it's very worrisome. And it

52:11corroborates all three independent analyses, three of them in two of them in different countries. One was in Italy like you just laid out there with 300,000 people. They found the mRNA injections increased the risk of three distinct types of cancers and overall cancer hospitalizations by 23%.

52:33And then we had the study in South Korea with 8 million people and 8.4 million and they found those increased risks of six major cancers comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated. And lastly, there was another analysis of different CDC data, CDC mortality data and that found he found 138,000 excess cancer deaths in the United States alone since 2021. So yeah, these injections appear to have induced a cancer epidemic.

53:06>> So now is this just a correlation or are they saying it's a causation in these studies?

53:12They they say it's just a correlation, but that's all those studies can do. But what we can do as researchers is look at the biological plausibility. And there's hundreds of studies now looking at the biological plausibility. There's over 17 distinct mechanisms that the shots may induce cancer. Uh 17 and one big one is or three big ones are hyperinflammation, immune dysregulation and actually genetic disruption. And we found it turns off tumor suppressor genes P-53 and BA. And in fact, we published a paper finding it integrated into the genome of a stage 4 bladder cancer patient. Uh this this vaccine DNA

53:56plasmid was literally fused into her tumor DNA and yeah it's undeniable now.

54:02>> So so what what ex So the mechanism is is it so I don't understand the mechanism. I know that that uh the the the COVID vac was would would tell me if this is the correct way to say polluted with DNA that would contaminate your DNA is and then they're finding the spike protein inside cancer cells. Is is I am I correct on those things?

54:29>> Oh, you're absolutely correct. His name was Professor Sano in Japan. He found vaccine spike protein inside breast cancer, metastatic breast cancer cells um in the nucleus of those cells, which probably means it was causing it. We know the spike protein itself appears to be carcinogenic uh based on all the laboratory studies. And you're right, the DNA is left over in the vials from the manufacturing process. Um it's supposed to be cleaned out, but it's not. Over 10 reports have found DNA contamination exceeding regulatory limits by like tens of thousands of percent. Um, and so that can get into

55:10the genome that's not supposed to be in there. But you injected in lipid nano particles, it gets in and again that's what our study showed. that DNA that's not supposed to be there got into this woman's chromosome 19 uh seemingly resulting in the stage 4 turbo bladder cancer >> and so did were they was fizer moerna were they aware of this and did they suppress this or is this news to them?

55:38Yeah, they apparently, as far as we're publicly aware, they did not do any carcinogenicity or genotoxicity studies whatsoever before rolling them out to humans. Now, they may have, and that's classified, and they haven't released it to the public, which wouldn't surprise me either. It could be one of the two.

55:57Um, but regardless, you know, we're just now uncovering this. independent researchers are finding this and we're seeing it in the population data and you know there's got to be some form of accountability here. We got to get these shots off of the market. We cannot be increasing accelerating now our cancer rates. It's the second leading cause of death worldwide.

56:19Um so we know that uh they lied that Fiser lied because uh during a couple years ago uh during a uh a hearing at the European Parliament they had an executive from Fizer admit that they never even tested to see if the vaccine stopped transmission or contraction even though they said it was 95% effective at doing those things. Um and of course they so we know that they uh to me it seems like of course they knew that they didn't release that study. This is my theory. And then of course they're like oh no we and she the reason why the executive from Fizer said they didn't do the studies was because they were moving

57:03at the speed of science. what the which is there that's a madeup term and you would think the speed of science would include a test to see if it actually does what they think it's going to do.

57:14Right.

57:16>> Yeah. Exactly. The speed of science with a novel gene therapy is, you know, 10 to 15 years. It's not it's not six months.

57:24That's right.

57:25>> And so, yeah, it's it was an absolute travesty. And, you know, Yeah, I agree.

57:30They probably did do did have the these data and they didn't release it. We know they manipulated the trial data. They did all sorts of illegal practices uh before emergency use authorization. All laid out in the Fiser papers by Naomi Wolf. Um and again that's uh that's illegal. That's criminal charges. And so there there was going to be an investigation into them. Well, in fact, there is a ongoing investigation.

57:57Senator Rod Johnson found that the FDA buried myocarditis and stroke signals.

58:04They didn't tell the public. And so all these people got heart damage and strokes uh because the government suppressed data. They covered it up.

58:16>> Uh I would like to say this is shocking, but it's not shocking to me because I've been following this closely since I got vaccine injured in April of 2021.

58:26And uh just talking about this uh anywhere, I was met with such overwhelming uh animosity and uh people trying to tell me to shut up uh and to tell thinking that I was uh spreading misinformation. It's so weird because I always considered myself a lefty and lefties were always skeptical of big pharma. We knew they were a criminal organization that would regularly kill people for profit. We all knew that. But somehow when COVID happened, they flipped and they all became spokespeople for big pharma and the government like Dr. Fouchy who's a unbelievable liar. So much so he needed to get a pardon going

59:09back to 2015. So, uh, that to me that's the do do you see any I mean the people who I the lefties that I used to hang out with used to protest against GMO in foods and then they they look like like the the the rock musician Neil Young and and he just completely flipped and he went from protesting GMOs and food to saying I'm going to take my music off of Spotify uh because Joe Rogan's telling the truth about COVID and the vaccines.

59:40Do you do you do you do you run into that too? Are you so just as surprised as I was by that kind of and and and what could you do you have any theories on how we can account for that kind of flip-flop in people's thinking?

59:52>> Yeah, I've run into that often and I still do. And yeah, all those individuals that hopped on the Fizer Madna government bandwagon with these shots, you know, now they look very foolish, especially now with the cancer data released. So now's the time to acknowledge reality. Um don't take any more booster shots. And unfortunately, many of those individuals did fall into what's called mass psychosis. Um they fell into this trap believing everything the government said, wanting to basically do and think what their peers thought and they couldn't get out of it.

60:30And then they subjected themselves to multiple booster shots. And now they may be facing these large increases in cancer risks, heart damage, subclinical heart damage, uh brain damage. Uh we published multiple studies on that now.

60:46And so yeah, you know, we got to we got to stop this. This was madness the past five years. People lost their minds. We got to get back to reality. Now, this now that study I I referenced early in this segment, that's a that that hasn't been peer-reviewed yet. Correct.

61:05>> Which one?

61:06>> Um Oh, hang on. I don't I just You know what? I lost it. But have there have there been um the one that I've um uh the most recent one that's shows a 6.4% >> Oh, yeah. Yeah. The SEIR data. The SER data that that doesn't get peer-reviewed. that's literally just straight from the government's database.

61:25Um, they post it every year and it goes through a large vetting process and analysis process and it's used, you know, by all sorts of organizations, uh, governments to assess cancer incidents. That that particular data doesn't necessarily need to be peer-reviewed. It's been vetted for, you know, decades already. Um, but the two other papers that found the co shots increased the risk of seven major cancers, those were peer-reviewed.

61:55Whoa. So again, this is just forformational purposes. We're not giving anyone medical advice at this show. Always consult your own physician before you make any medical decisions.

62:07Don't come. And that's our advice. And uh hopefully that's enough to cover our ass here. Uh we'll see what happens. Um, we got more to talk about with you. Uh, but I want to remind people if you want to hear uh me talk about this, I'll be in Burbank, California, May 7th, Tulsa, Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, and then May 23rd in Atlanta, Georgia, May 24th, Raleigh, North Carolina. Then Spokane, Tacoma, and Levittown, New York. Go to jimmy.com for tickets. Over to Steph.

62:36>> All right. Uh, David said, "Jimmy, look at the shadows of poles of the poles and trees when the guy jumps down. They all lean one. They all lean way right. It cannot be 12:30 p.m. That footage is from another day. Thank you, David, for that. Uh, maybe Tyler had a cartoon gun that shot out of the flag that says bang, diligent escape.

63:02Uh, hold on. David Ike is correct.

63:05Israel government is operating for the worldwide cult.

63:11Uh, play the clip where Charlie Kirk says he's not a fan of circumcision. You got to know that made some enemies. And that's future interact. Jimmy, I sent it to uh one of your emails that you were kidding. I didn't know that. I just texted it to you. Uh, Mr. Meisy, and thank you for uh and that was my my friend Future intact. Thank you for the link. That was very helpful. I already shared it with Jimmy.

63:35>> So, oh, back to Jim. So again, now there's uh been some really groundbreaking studies recently about the treatment of cancer and 84% of CA cancer patients taking a combination of ivormectin and meendazol for 6 months declared their cancer was either completely gone, regressed, or had stopped spreading.

64:02Um let's listen a little was the largest human observational study on ivormectton meendazol and cancer. We had like 200 cancer patients and what we found was after 6 months 84.4% of them reported to have benefited in their cancer treatments. About half either their cancers disappeared they had no evidence of disease or their tumors shrank and again that is half of this entire cohort. So I actually went and looked up this study and there it is. realworld clinical outcomes of ivormectin and menendazol on cancer patients results from a prospective observational cohort.

64:36Okay. Uh this is all this has not been peer-reviewed yet but here's the cancers they're talking about prostate breast lung colon and liver right um and here so here's the disease status at baseline. So tell can you explain this uh graphic so to us?

64:58>> Yeah. Yeah. So what you'll see there is on the one to the left you'll see 37% of the entire cancer cohort had active metastatic cancer. So the cancer was spreading of the 200 cancer patients.

65:14And then you know 63% had um 63% had stable cancer. Um, so they had tumors, but it wasn't actively metastatic, so it was not stage three or four yet. And then on the right, um, yeah, you'll basically just see that, uh, that's the not spreading graph there.

65:36>> Okay. And then tell me what this says.

65:39>> Yeah. So this is the biggest part actually. This is the cancer outcomes.

65:43This was the primary outcome we measured. And so these patients were prescribed through the tele medicine platform of the wellness company Ivormectin Mendazol uh compounded capsules. And so we collected the baseline status as you just went through. This was the follow-up status after 6 months. U about 61% responded. So that's a 61% response rate. That's pretty high um for a survey study like this. So these are self-reported cancer outcomes. And after the 6 months of taking the ivormectin and memazol, 32.8% declared that their cancers disappeared.

66:23They had what's called no evidence of disease. 15.6% reported that their tumors were shrinking. It's called regression. And then 36% said their cancers were not progressing. So that's called cancer stabilization. And that makes up the 84.4% 4% clinical benefit ratio. In other words, 84.4% of the cancer patients who took ivormectin mbendazol benefited in their cancer treatment and then 15.6% did actually progress and so that actually gives validity to these results. These are not skewed. Um this appears to be real but more study now is needed with clinical adjudication of the outcome. So now we have to do randomized

67:10human trials uh which costs you know tens of millions of dollars by the way and nobody's funding it. And so you know I'm because of co I've realized how corrupted the medical system is and it's all based on money and profit and um even the medical journals are completely corrupted. We've learned that and there's a big incentive. This I got this from Dr. John Campbell. Overall, overall it is estimated that annual costs of standard chemotherapies average $111,000 per year. So if you use ivormectin and membazol, it's going to be pennies on the dollar, right? That'll be much cheaper. Correct.

67:58>> Yeah. ivormectin and membazol it's going to be a few grand at most a year not $111,000 um while and and so you pay $111,000 a year to destroy your whole body right and so you know it doesn't sound like a great deal to me I'd rather spend much less and not destroy my entire body >> well that's the thing here doc Campbell Dr. Campbell points out this uh if you use ivormectin and benbendazol uh it is it is low toxicity can't so whereas uh when you get chemotherapy it's highly toxic it wipes out your immune system this doesn't do that and it has a multi-targeted so it's not just for one type of cancer it's for lots of

68:45different types of cancer right >> oh yeah so there's been over a hundred pre-clinical studies in the animals, in the rats and in the test tube with ivormectendazol and fenbendazol, these antiparasitics um in cancers and cancer cells. And they found across these studies over the past few decades, there are over 14 distinct anti-cancer mechanisms across more than 12 cancer types. And so it it it exerts so many mechanisms against the cancer cells unlike chemo which basically operates on one mechanism. But with the antiparasitics a few key mechanisms are that first of all it induces apoptosis in cancer

69:28cells. That's what's called you know basically the cell become self-programs to self-destruct. Um so you want that in cancer cells obviously it cuts off cancer angioenesis.

69:40So the blood vessels to new cancer cells can't form as well. It disrupts microtubules in the cancer cells. That's critical for cell division. So if you disrupt that scaffolding of the cells, they can't divide anymore. And there's many other things we could keep going down the list. Irectin actually targets cancer stem cells. And so cancer stem cells are critical. They're like the source of some of these cancers. And chemo doesn't get rid of them. So you might get rid of the cancer with chemo, but it's going to come back in in five years because you still have the cancer stem cells. Ivormectin appears to

70:16eliminate them in the laboratory studies. So So you you target cancer with all these mechanisms. Um it's no surprise we saw such a high clinical benefit ratio.

70:29>> So I became aware of the lies that Dr.

70:33Fouchi and the medical establishment and the big pharma captured establishment media were telling because when I got vaccine injured, I was entered. I had a a doctor who was doing a study on how to treat people who were vaccine injured and he put me in the study and what one of the first things he prescribed for me was Ivormectin. And I remember saying, "Hey, what? This is horse paste." And he explained to me that no, Ivormectin was considered a miracle drug, a wonder drug that they thought could even cure cancer before COVID started. And the reason why they were lying and misleading people about Ivormectin, saying it was for

71:15animals and not humans, was because if it did work on COVID, they could not get their emergency youth authorization for the VA COVID vaccine. And of course they wanted to get that because there's, you know, hundreds and hundreds of billions of dollars involved in getting that approved. They got it approved. And now we find out that they were lying all along. Even people like Chris Cuomo who was pushing that kind of propaganda, pro- Fouchy pro big farmer, he now got vaccine injured and he's being treated.

71:45And so now he realizes that he was lied to about it and he repeated those lies without ever investigating it. And so um that's just my own personal story about Ivormectin. That's how and that was the first tip off that I got that they weren't only lying about Ivormectin.

72:01They were lying about everything to do with COVID and the vaccines. They were lying about where the virus came from.

72:06They were lying about funding the creation of the virus. They were lying about the death rate from the virus.

72:11They made it seem way more deadly than it actually was. Uh they were lying about masks. They were lying about lockdowns. They were lying about the vaccine stopping transmission. the vaccine stopping contraction, uh the social distancing, there wasn't a thing about COVID that Dr. Fouchy and the establishment media did not lie to you about. Uh is is what am I wrong when I say that >> your assessment is is 100% correct?

72:40Basically, you know, 95% of the things we were told were a lie. They were false. They were not real. And because of those lies, uh, millions of people have have paid the price. They've they've died. They've been injured. Um, you know, via all the things, the hospital protocols, the ventilators, the rem desave, the mRNA injections.

73:06Millions millions have suffered and they got away with it.

73:11>> Um, I I even forgot to mention the ventilators. You know, Fouchy eventually came around to admitting, "Yeah, we were wrong to put people on ventilators." So, what they would do is they put people on ventilators and then they would give them drugs to stop to slow their breathing. That isn't that what happened.

73:29>> Yeah. They would throw them on the ventilators. The ventilators would itself would kill a lot of the people and then Yeah. They would pump them with rem desae which causes kidney failure.

73:40um it's it's extremely toxic to the kidneys and then they just died. Um and so it was it was ridiculous. And so many of these patients never needed to go on the ventilator. Perhaps they could have taken the repurposed drugs, the ivormectin, the hydroxychloricquin, and these other drugs that now we have 105 studies showing they worked. Um, you know, yeah, >> I I I know people in the comedy world in Los Angeles who um um they had a loved one die of COVID early on and they became vehement propaganda pushers and haters of people questioning the CO narrative because of it. And they would go on stage and try to uh shame their

74:24own audience into looking into CO or looking into what the government and big farmer was saying about it. It's the one of the most despicable thing and I understand people being traumatized by a loved one dying from COVID. But shouldn't that in my estimation that would make you want to get more informed instead of less informed? And it's just the most despicable thing I've seen uh happen just in the comedy world because you know I'm always been proud to be a comedian because we always question authority. We always uh push back on establishment narratives and find holes in the status quo and that completely

75:03flipped during COVID and those people are still they have they have not apologized. They haven't said that they were wrong. They haven't even looked into it and they're still running around wearing masks today. Lots of them. No kidding. No kidding. And so I just want to show you this. This is Dr. uh John Campbell and his this is what he his conclusion about this study we're talking about.

75:25It explains here the uh the cancer anti-cancer mechanisms of ivormectin and mendazol and the way that they attack various tumors using various mechanisms. So there we are. This research needs to be done to know if this is all correct in the larger scale clinical trial situation. um it's probably not going to be done, which of course is a complete utter disgrace and a complete tragedy uh to those people suffering cancers.

75:57Could be me, could be you, could be a family member.

76:03Just let them die if they can't pay the $111,000 a year.

76:08You know what the heck?

76:13I don't know h how how do why aren't governments doing this research? Why aren't independent universities doing this research?

76:24I'll tell you why. And I think he knows why is because they're also captured by the big money pharma gives. And then Dr.

76:32Fouchy would be the one who divvied out uh money for research and if you don't go along with the program, you're not going to get that money. Isn't that why they're not doing that research?

76:43Yeah, it's exactly why. It's exactly why they're not going to get any money.

76:47They're got not going to make any profits. They cannot patent ivormectin and membol. They can patent the novel gene therapies, the biologics, the immune checkpoint inhibitors, uh the chemotherapies, they can patent all of that and they can make hundreds of millions of dollars. But ivormectin and membazol, no. No money to be made. And so they're not going to do it. They're just not going to do it. We can do it.

77:14Mala Foundation, we can do this study.

77:16Uh but you know, we don't have the the funding capacities of these giant pharmaceutical corporations and governments that should have done these studies uh you know, 50 years ago.

77:30>> Let's see if he has anything else to say.

77:32>> Just because there's no money in it. Is that why it's not done?

77:35>> There it is.

77:36>> Let me know what you think.

77:40Let's close with phenomenal frustration, but at least you watched, so thank you for that.

77:45>> Phenomenal frustration. Why do you think there aren't more medical uh prominent medical professionals screaming this from the mountain?

77:55>> Good question. It is it seems since this study came out, since we put this study up, it it has many doctors have began to raise the alarm. uh many have previously but now is the time where this needs to be headline news in all the major news organizations and you know I know it it's not peer- reviewviewed but I have some good news on that. Um you know it may appear in a major cancer journal soon. I'll just say that. So um yeah this this is uh this is going to change things I think drastically and we got to we got to share this information.

78:31One in three Americans are going to be diagnosed with cancer in their lifetime projected 33%.

78:38Right? We don't want that. We want to stop that and we don't want people to suffer through the chemotherapy process if you know it's just I've seen so many people the their stage four cancer they get pumped full of chemo radiation they you know cut up their organs with surgery and then the cancer comes back and they're left lifeless and you know it's just a travesty. We got to get away from dinosaur medicine, you know, cavemanlike thinking of destroying the entire body to treat a cancer. We got to target it and we got to target it with non-toxic compounds.

79:17>> It sounds like it would be impossible to make jokes about this, but I've got plenty of them. Come see me in Atlanta, Georgia, May 28th. Uh oh, no, May 23rd and Raleigh, North Carolina, May 24th.

79:29I'll be in Burbank May 7th. Tulsa, Oklahoma, Oklahoma City. Spokane, Tacoma, and June 26, 27th in Lebanon, New York. Go to jimmy.com for a link for tickets. There's more on this cancer treatment coming up in just a second.

79:44Over to Steph.

79:45>> Okay. Thank you, Jimmy.

79:47All right, I'm seeing this one that says, uh, during the first week of war, several tornadoes broke out in the straight of Hermuz, an unheard occurrence. Thank you for that one.

80:01That's from John Jacob. I would be curious to know what happened to the person in the stands behind Trump who was allegedly shot. Was that staged as well? Was the shooter using blanks fully laden swall? We won't know >> because they're not doing an investigation.

80:16>> How weird. They're not doing investigation on an an attempted assassination that actually did murder somebody, but there's no they're not doing an investigation. Oh, why would that back to Jimmy?

80:29>> So, there's been another breakthrough.

80:32um in cancer treatment and it's going to come from a place you didn't expect it.

80:36It's going to come from the gut of a frog. A single dose of newly discovered frog gut bacterium completely eradicates 100% of cancerous tumors within just 15 days in mice. Landmark study finds the natural bacterium uingelia americanana selectively targets, colonizes and eliminates tumors with no detectable toxicity.

81:07um a sing there's a single dose achieving complete tumor eradication, durable immune memory and superiority over established therapies represents one of the most striking outcomes reported in cancer research. And here's the study. There it is. discovery and characterization of anti-tumor gut microbia from amphibians and reptiles uh ingella americana as a novel therapeutic agent with dual cytoxic and immuno dual properties and here's just a little piece from that study this striking phenomena suggests that amphibians may possess inherent resistance mechanisms against carcinogenesis although the underlying molecular and Cellular

81:56mechanisms responsible for this apparent cancer resistance remain incompletely elucidated and represent an area of significant science interest.

82:06Comparative efficacy analysis revealed that both antiPDL1 and DOCS achieved significant tumor growth inhibition compared with PBS treated controls confirming the anti-tumor activity of these established therapies in our experimental model. However, e Americana demonstrated marketkedly superior anti-tumor effects substantially outperforming both of the conventional treatments. Now, can you you got to take a minute and explain this to to to us?

82:40>> Yeah, this is a this is a groundbreaking cancer discovery. Well, yeah, it's in mice. It's groundbreaking. So yeah, what they did in this study was they went basically in a Japanese rainforest.

82:53These Japanese researchers, they found some tree frogs and they isolated, you know, like over 20 bacterial strains from their gut. They tested all of them for anti-cancer activity, but they found one that was particularly potent. It was called the Awingula Americana. And so what they did was they inject they first of all they had a bunch they had like 10 mice more than 10 mice with giant tumors with cancer. They injected into the tail veins of these mice the awingula americanana bacterium and that those bacteria traveled selectively to the giant tumors. It went straight to the tumor site. It didn't go to any healthy

83:40tissues. It didn't go anywhere else. It went to the hypoxic environment, so lacking oxygen of this tumor. And it eradicated 100% of the tumors. All of it was gone completely within just 15 days.

83:56And there was no toxicity to other organs. There was no weight loss in the mice, no abnormal marker. So it was not toxic to them. and the bacteria. So what happened was the bacteria went in, it colonized the tumor, replicated and destroyed it and destroyed it via potent mechanism. So not only did it directly kill the tumor cells, but it it elicited support from the immune system to turbocharge uh the immune attack on the cancers. And so that's why they disappeared. and they compared it to chemotherapy in the same in in different mice. Um they compared the awingula americanana to chemo and to immune checkpoint inhibitors. The

84:42awingula americanana uh outperformed the chemo and immune checkpoint inhibitors drastically. So this is a huge discovery. We got to start researching this. Move on to humans. So is this so when it says a PDL1 and DOX is that what what is is what what is that referring to what treatment >> PDL1 is a form of amunotherapy that they give for cancers conventional conventional treatment doc stands for doc rubicon which is the most commonly administered chemotherapy it goes by the name the red devil uh because it's highly cytotoxic to the entire body. So while they tried those conventional ones and they did effectively suppress tumor

85:28progression and delayed tumor growth, only one complete response was observed in the antiPDL1 treated group and neither therapy achieved consistent tumor eradication across the cohort. In striking cont contrast, the E Americana completely eliminated tumor cells and achieved a 100% rate across all treated animals. That's that seems almost too good to be true, doesn't it? It does. It does. So that means every time they injected this bacteria into the tail vein, the tumors disappeared completely without fail every single time. And they actually did reintroduction experiments.

86:09So they reintroduced the cancers to the same mice whose tumors disappeared and the tumors couldn't grow. So they it had immune memory. The mice had immune memory um as a result as well. So I mean that's also very promising. So it's it's it's crazy. You know, nobody's really investigating bacterium for eliminating cancer. There's GMO bacterium that have been developed, but those are dangerous.

86:34Um this is natural. And so, you know, we really got to hone in on this, test it in more mice, more cancer types, find the safety, find the dosing, and then eventually, you know, move on to humans.

86:47Um, and you have to remember there's easy fail like, so it basically if you inject it and something goes wrong and it starts to infect other organs, um, which could happen possibly, you know, an antibiotic will, you know, cut that off. And so there's there's an exit mechanism if something went wrong. So that's the other good point about it.

87:07>> I mean, at the end of the day, this is amazingly great news, right? The fact that it's probably going to be suppressed and uh big farmer will try to uh keep it from you, uh that's another story. But do do you think big farmer will be able to find a way to make money off this and switch from chemotherapy to this therapy if it works in humans?

87:30>> I don't Well, first they won't. Well, they actually they could patent a version of this bacterium if they modify it, which wouldn't be surprising. So, it wouldn't surprise me if they go find this, they genetically modify it and then either and then further they isolate, you know, a single compound and claim it's as good, you know. So, they could do something like that, but they cannot just, you know, patent a natural gut bacterium. So, you know, we'll see if they try something. But uh in the meantime, you know, we need independent scientists on this. We can't let it be suppressed.

88:07>> How how do you First of all, that seems like a crazy idea. Hey, let's let's uh take some bacteria from a frog's gut.

88:15See if that cures cancer. How do they come up with that idea?

88:19>> Good question. Good question. And they must have they must have had an idea previously, some previous research and just the understanding that these amphibians don't usually get cancer. So they thought, you know, maybe there's something in them in these amphibians and the reptiles that might be able to fight cancer. And they went to the the microbiome thinking perhaps that was a reason. And maybe maybe it is. Maybe it is.

88:46>> Well, we're finding out how important your gut microbiome is to your overall health, right? which seems to be new information. Uh how long have people known about the connection between your your gut biome, microbiome, and your overall health? And why is it only coming out now?

89:03>> Yeah, it's it's vitally important. And you're right, it wasn't really talked about, you know, 15, 20 years ago. It's slowly gained traction and it is a vital importance particularly, you know, in developing children, small infants. In fact, 25% of American babies now have zero bifido bacterium. That's the, you know, keystone gut microbiome that uh micro microbe that you need for healthy development. And so 25% of babies don't have it anymore for multiple reasons. um for you know pesticide use, uh C-sections, no breastfeeding, uh hypervaccination, um all these different things are contributing to that loss. But that loss

89:52increased the risk in that study of asthma, allergies, and uh you know, developmental issues.

90:02So, you know, we don't we we got to start paying attention to this and restore our microbiome to what it was, you know, hundreds of years ago.

90:12>> You know, uh RFK used to talk like this when he came on my show. Uh he sense has kind of backed off this and you know, to to the point where in testimony in front of Congress, he said that the COVID 19 vaccine was safe and effective. Um which is a bit of a heartbreak. Can you you want to comment on on what's happening with RFK and his ability to get anything done?

90:38>> Yeah. Um all the progress that has been made in the past year on vaccinations, you know, the big vaccine overhaul of the childhood vaccine schedule. They shrunk it from like 80 doses down to about 30 routine doses. They took away the or stopped recommending universal hepatitis B shots for newborn infants.

91:04So they did lots of good things. But then that was reversed suddenly about a month ago by a judge named Brian Murphy.

91:11He literally stopped those changes in their tracks and reversed them. And so we're back to where we were, you know, three years ago. So you know, nothing really changed unfortunately. They tried and now they're not talking about vaccines really at all and you know we're not seeing we still see them on the market. Um we thought they would be pulled off. We thought we would at least get a blackbox warning. That hasn't even happened. And you know we've documented in our own studies you know hundreds and hundreds of verified deaths via autopsy evidence and still no blackbox warning.

91:50>> Okay. Well, guess what? There um new information that there has been cancer cures that have been suppressed by the CIA. That story coming up next. But uh if you'd like to hear my I know it sounds crazy. Jim, you have jokes about this stuff? Yes. Come see me. Uh May 23rd in Atlanta, Georgia. May 24th in Raleigh, North Carolina. I'll be May 7th in Burbank, California. Tulsa, Oklahoma, Oklahoma City. Tacoma and Levittown, New York. June 26th and 27th. Go to jimmyd door.com for a link for tickets. Over to Steph.

92:22>> All right. Tulio Pont Colon. Between this this pesticides, weather metification, how can this be seen as not done on purpose? Right.

92:33>> This is depopulation. That's Tulio.

92:36Thank you, Tulio, for your generosity.

92:39So, Iran blows up the enemy radio installations and soon after they suddenly have record rainfall. So much for the need for those dissalination plants. Oh, Nathan. Kelly Singer. What's up, Kelly? Thank you for your generosity.

92:55Please uh release the Epstein files.

92:58Kelly, the Jewish religion teaches that Jewish souls are literally worth more than non-Jewish souls. This is the source of all our problems. Savage.

93:09A DARPA N3 program was released and correlates to CO 19. Andrew Lap. Maybe Tyler had a cartoon gun that shot out a flag that says bang. Uh, diligent escape. Jimmy, are you interested in going to Rumble right now? Or you want to do one more segment?

93:25>> Let's do one more segment.

93:26>> All right. Thank you.

93:27>> With Nicholas and back to then we'll switch over. Uh, do you have time to do one more segment?

93:33>> Yeah.

93:33>> Okay. Fantastic. So, let's get into this.

93:36>> Um, here's it's really everybody should follow you on Twitter. It's full It's full of amazing information that you're not going to get other places. Um, the CIA classified a 1950 study showing anti-parasitics disrupt cancer growth and kept it buried for over half a century.

93:57Whoa. And here is that here's the study that I guess recently became unearthed and you can read it for yourself. It talks about parasitic worms which live in the intestine exhibit a pronounced uh they deposit in their bodies large quantities of glycogen which is a fuel for cancer.

94:18Um uh the accumulation of glycogen is one of the properties which they share with tumors. the tissues of both intestinal parasitic worms and cancer tumors belong to the So tell me about this study what they knew how long ago they so they they knew that antiparasitics meaning like things like uh ivormectin uh were possibly treating cancer. How long ago was this and why did they suppress it and how did it get released?

94:50Yeah, this this is another crazy story and you know some of the stuff you can't even make this stuff up. So yeah, in the 1950s the CIA obtained a document from Soviet scientists. It was actually a Soviet study where they did find that parasites and tumors exhibited similar behavior in the body, similar mechanisms of how they grew. They both loved sugar. They loved glycogen and they feed on it and it helped them grow. They found so they found they work in similar ways. But the big part of that Soviet study was they found that the antiarasitic mirror D um did exert anti-cancer activity in animals. So they literally tested it and

95:36and the tumors shrunk, right? And so the CIA had that document in the in the 50s and they classified it for over half a century. Over half a century. So imagine if if they had publicly released it, said look what we found. This is important research. Perhaps we would be 50 years ahead in this antiparasitic and cancer research. Perhaps millions of cancer victims could have been spared.

96:06Uh but now we were set back. we were set back and we're picking up the pieces.

96:11And that's why, you know, it's no surprise the CIA buried this given our recent study where we found that 84.4% of the cancer patients reported to have benefited in their cancer.

96:23>> You using antiparasitics like Ivormectin and Menendazol, right?

96:27>> Yes. Ivormect, Men, Fenbendazol, all of these exhibit anti-cancer activity.

96:34How did this why is this just being coming to our attention now?

96:40>> They declassified it actually in 2011, but it went under the radar. Nobody really picked up on it and it recently resurfaced and rightfully so because we have to understand what our government was seemingly bearing and hiding from the population and it was just ridiculous. That should have been publicly available knowledge. Scientists would have been all over it. But no, they waited over 50 years, over 60 years to declassify that information.

97:12>> Well, if there's one thing the CIA is famous for, it's looking out for the working class every man out there. Am I right?

97:20It's It's like their entire surveillance state is just designed to spot when somebody finally figures out what they're really doing. That's that's the it's not there for your safety. It's there to stop you from figuring out all the that the CIA is up to.

97:35That's what it seems like the surveillance states for, not for us obviously. Um so any uh any uh you know this has been you know quite an overwhelming amount of information today on cancer and the treatments and the coverups of the treatments and the causes of the cancers that are correlated with the COVID vaccine. Um where where do you see do you I mean there they've stopped RFK from bringing this to light. They've very very successfully discredited him as a crazy person, which is exactly what they do, right? Um they've been doing it to him.

98:17Everybody, he was the darling of liberals in the left when he was going after big chemical companies and cleaning up the Hudson and fighting GMOs and things of that and fight fighting glyphosate, right? And he he was the first one who won a big case to connect glyphosate with cancer. and everybody loved him then and then now since he's been speaking out against vaccines um uh or telling the truth about them they've completely discredited him. Um but now all that seems like the the the the wave of this latest information about all this stuff from co vaccines to the the antiparasitic it seems like it's almost

98:57too hard for the the the normal you know the establishment media which is bought by big farmer is there to manufacture your consent for big farmer's agenda not to help you but it seems like this is overwhelming now and this wave of information will be able to you know poke through that. Do you think that that will happen and where do you see us in five years?

99:19>> Yeah, the in the the the the title wave and tsunamis of information cannot be stopped and the public opinion is swaying um in the right direction away from the falsified government narratives. In fact, a key evidence of that is a recent Rasmucin survey found that 56% of Americans now believe that the CO 19 injections caused mass deaths.

99:47So now the majority of Americans appear to have woken up to that and people are sharing all this information. people are are seeing that things were hidden, things were suppressed, and lots of people were damaged and killed um particularly in the past five years. And so, yeah, I think honestly we could be in a very positive situation in five years, but you know, it's going to depend on some key people making key and correct decisions and uh not being compromised. You know, people have to stop being corrupted and do the right thing for a change. That didn't happen in the past five years. That's why we're

100:26at where we're at now. But things can change and I think they will.

100:31>> So what you know, do you have any predictions on the future of RFK and his work in the HHS? because it seems like he's fighting a losing battle. And I've made the case that he would be better off leaving the administration and speaking out against what they're doing.

100:51Not only from, you know, them giving a a legal shield to glyphosate, which we know can gives everybody cancer. uh to him having to go along with the Donald Trump administration giving $35 billion uh to the makers of uh OMPic uh where which is something that RFK was vehemently against. So it seems like he's getting compromised left and right.

101:20And do you I think he would be better off if he left. Sometimes I think that sometimes I think not. But do you what do you think? Do you think it would be better off outside the administration criticizing them uh and and and and doing lawsuits on behalf of people injured by vaccines or glyphosate and those other things? Or do you think it's better to have someone inside fighting for us?

101:46>> That's a good question. That's a good question. based on recent developments, you're right, the glyphosate order of, you know, protecting Bayer, you know, these criminal major corporations um protecting glyphosate, giving the the makers liability protection for cancer, um despite a, you know, studies coming out, a recent study came out showing glyphosate causes over 10 major cancers and rats um at low levels, low concentrations. Um, and you know, we saw that we see, you know, him pushing all sorts of things we don't want to see him push. And it it appears, yeah, there might be a time when he would be more

102:24effective outside of the administration because, yeah, right now he's sequestered. Um, they're burying him, they're attacking him, and they're not letting him do anything. So, I think perhaps there could come a time when he does that, but um, we'll see. We'll see.

102:41Um, I think right now, um, you're right, he could be making more of an impact on public sentiment, um, outside of the administration, but, uh, for all we know, he has something planned, uh, that may make a big difference, um, and they're waiting till after the midterms, you know. I don't know. I'm not in there. We'll have to wait and see.

103:05>> Uh, Nicholas Holshire, am I pronouncing your last name correct?

103:09>> Holshire. Yeah.

103:09>> Yes. Nicholas Holture. Everybody should follow him on uh Twitter, Nick Holture.

103:15Uh great information you can't get other places. You're doing great work with the McCulla Foundation. I appreciate uh appreciate you making time for our show and coming on. Thank you very much.

103:27>> Thanks for having me.

103:28>> Okay. Uh and if you like to hear my jokes about this, which I do. I know it sounds crazy, but I do. Come see me May 23rd in Atlanta. May 24th in Raleigh, North Carolina. will be May 7th in Burbank, then Tulsa, Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Spokane, Tacoma, June 26th and 27th, Levanttown, New York at Governors.

103:47Go to jimmy.com for a link for tickets.

103:49Right now, we're going to jump over the Rumble. So, come see us the rest of the show over at Rumble. We got uh Hey, turns out uh there's no way the gun that the FBI says killed Charlie Kirk was the gun. And we're going to talk about that and a lot more. Come see us over at Rumble. And you know before we go over I just want to ask you one quick question.

104:08Somebody said that you dealt with that uh neuralgia.

104:12>> Yeah.

104:12>> What what did you do that uh helped you with that? They are concerned that their mom may be experiencing that.

104:20>> So I got I got treated with the ivormectin. I got treated with uh natoinesise.

104:28I got treated with fluoxamine.

104:31Um, and there might have been a couple other things that I can't remember cuz it's been so long. Um, so my advice is to try to find a doctor that's is uh is up on this kind of stuff and treating vaccine injury from the CO 19 vac. Uh, I know Pierre Corey was a leader in that. Um, he's now, you know, they they've stripped him of some of his accreditations, but he's still practicing and he's moved to Florida. So if you're in Florida, try to see him.

105:02Um, you could also see Dr. McCulla. Uh, I don't So I don't So I that's my my, you know, that's the only advice I could give you is try to find somebody who's actually uh actively working on this and is on in on the no on this stuff.

105:19>> Was Dr. Yo also instrumental in that?

105:22>> Yes, but he's a re he's more I think he's more of a researcher. Okay. Dr.

105:26Uganda.

105:26>> Mhm.

105:28Uh, but maybe not. Maybe not. I don't know. Um, maybe he's also treating people. Uh, so that's I wish I had more to tell you. Okay, we'll see you over at Rumble.